422 



Petagna does not mention any black spots on the red abdomen, I do 

 not consider that I ought to accept the uncertain and inappropriate 

 name niger for the species, and I therefore preserve the ordinary 

 appellation cinnabarinus. 



E. puniceus C. Koch ') , which is said to be 6 */ 2 lines long, and 

 is therefore considerably larger than E. cinnabarinus, is probably a 

 separate species, and identical with E. Audouinii [Audouin] Brulle 

 1832 2 ), which Walckenaer (Ins. Apt., I, p. 395) refers to E. cinna- 

 barinus. E. Audouinii is stated to be 13 millim. long, and to have 

 the whole pars thoracica red (as is also the case with E. puniceus, 

 according to C. Koch); the legs are black, with white apices to the 

 joints, the hindermost pair having a shade of red; the three po- 

 sterior pairs have a white line along the upper part. The abdomen 

 has sometimes 4, sometimes 6 black spots. 



(Pag. 51.) *Salticus xanthogramma [= Attus (?) inc. spec.]. 



Since, as far as I am aware, Attus xanthogramma Walck. 1825, 

 which is probably the female to A. bicolor "Walck. 1802 (Conf. Sim., 

 Eevis. d. Attidse, p. 138 (14)), has, at least since Lister's time, 

 never been found in England, and Lister's short description of his 

 n 2it. XXXIir 3 ) does not enable me to aggregate this spider either 

 to A. xanthogramma, to which it is referred by Blackwall, or to any 

 other species with which I am acquainted, it appears to me most 

 prudent to leave Lister's spider for the present undetermined, and to 

 defer distinguishing it by any name till it shall have been rediscovered 

 in England. 



(Pag. 55.) Salticus floricola [= Yllenus saltator (Sim.) 1869]. 



Syn.: fl862. Salticus floricola Cambr., List of new and rare Spid., cet., in 



Zoologist, 1862, p. 7945. 

 1869. Attus saltator Sim., Monogr. d. Attides, p. 611 (145). 

 1871. Salticus saltator Cambr., Descr. of some Brit. Spid., cet., in 

 Transact, of the Linn. Soc, XXVII, p. 401. 



As I have already (p. 392) stated, this species is quite different 

 from Attus or Euophrys floricola C. Koch, which is cited by Black - 



1) Die Arachn., IV, p. 102, Tab. CXXXVUI, fig. 315. 



2) Exped. scient. de Moree, Anim. Artie, p. 56, PI. XXVEU, fig. 10. 



3) Lister , Hist. Anim. Anglise tres tract. , p. 90. 



