136 



M. Kronfeld. 



Typha. 



Tournefort, Instit., p. 530, Tab. 301 (1719); Linne, Gen. plant. (1737) 

 Nr. 707; Gaertner, De fruct., I, p. 8, Tab. II, Fig. 1 (1788); Roth, Tent. Fl. 

 Germ., II, p. sec. p. 470 (1793); Persoon, Synopsi splant., p. 532 (1807); Brown, 

 Prodrom, fl. Nov. Holl., p. 338 (1810); De C and olle, Fl. de France, VI, p. 30 

 (1815); Humboldt et Bonpland, Nov. gen. et spec. plant., I, p. 82 (1815); 

 Pollinius, Fl. Veron., p. 100 (1824); Roxburgh, Fl. Ind., III, p. 566 (1832); 

 L. C. Richard in Guillem. Archiv, I, p. 193, PI. V (1833); Dupont in Annal. d. 

 Scienc. nat., IP ser., I, p. 57 (1834); Endlicher, Gen. plant., p. 241 (1836— 

 1840); Koch, Synopsis Fl. germ., p. 681 (1837); Barker-Webb et Berthelot, 

 Hist. nat. iles Canaries, III, sect. III, p. 291, PI. 218 (1836—1850); Hooker, Fl. 

 Boreali-Americana, II, p. 170 (1840); Kunth, Enum. plant., III, p. 90 (1841); 

 Visiani, Fl. dalmat., I, p. 187 (1842); Ledebour, Fl. ross., IV, p. 1 (1842— 

 1846); Godron, Fl. de Lorraine, II, p. 19 (1843); Plee, Types, PL 30 (1844); 

 Schnizlein, Typhaceen, p. 24 (1845); Spach, Hist. nat. d. veget., PI. 93, 2 

 (1846); Reichenbach, Icon. Fl. Germ., IX, p. 1 et Tab. 319—323; Presl, 

 Epimel. Botan., p. 239 (1849); Schur in Verhandl. des Siebenb. Ver. f. Naturw. 

 zu Hermannstadt, II, S. 177-195, 198—208, Tab. I, II; Sonder, Fl. Hamburg., 

 p. 506 (1851); Lindley, The veget. Kingdom., p. 126 (1853); Bertoloni, Fl. 

 Ital., X, p. 22 (1854); Godron et Grenier, Fl. de France, III, p. 333 (1855); 

 Seemann, Fl. Vitiensis, p.280 (1865—1873); Kurz in Seem. Journ. of Bot., V, 

 p. 94 (1867); Rohrbach in Verhandl. d. botan. Vereins f. Braudenb., XI, S. 73 

 (1869); Eichler, Blüthendiagr., I, S. III (1875); Bentham, Fl. Austral., VII, 

 p. 159 (1878); Bentham et Hooker, Gen. plant., III, p. sec, p. 955 (1883); 

 Boissier, FI. Orient., V, p. 49 (1884); Dietz, Ueber die Entwicklung der 

 Blüthe und Frucht von Typha und Sparganium (1887); Morong in Bullet, of 

 the Torrey Botan. Club, 1888, p. 1; Engler in Natürliche Pflanzenfamilien, II, 

 1, S. 183 (1888). 



Flor es in spicis superpositis, terminalibus, contiguis vel remotis, 

 densissime conferti; superior mascula, axi compressa, simplex, spatha cito 

 decidua in basi suffulta, spathis huiuscemodi compluribus locis in continuitate 

 sua interrupta; inferior feminea, axi tereti, ramosa, ramulis numerosis, setae- 

 formihus, 5 ad 2 mm longis, gradatis. Perianthium nullum. Flores 

 masculi: Nudi, 1 — 7-, saepissime 3-andri, pilis numerosis fasciatis, ex axi 

 ortis, simplieibus vel versus apicem dilatatis ramosisque instructi; filamenta fili- 

 formia, simplicia vel ramosa; antherae basifixae, oblongae, quadriloculares, loculis 

 oppositis, 2-loceTlatis, rimis lateralibus dehiseentibus, postremo eontortae, connec- 

 tivo supra dilatato, in corpusculum carnosum, subolivaceum producto, raphidis 

 abundanti; polline simplici vel conglobato, 4-dymo, plerumque sarcinaeformi, 

 granisSOadiO ^ indiam. Flores feminei: Nudivelbracteolis insummo spathu- 

 latis suffulti; ovarium oblongum, fusi forme, gynoplioro elongato, in basi pilis 

 numerosis (30—50), tenuissimis, fiUformibus vel versus apicem globulatis aut 

 clavulatis obsito stipitatum, in stylum gracilem erectumque superne productum, 



