1880.] A. F. R. Hoernle— ^ Collection of HimU Boots. 



49 



124 ^Tf trans, hum = Skr. , Causal ^ff qfw, Pr. ^T^i; or VI. el. 



H. ^t1, see No. 122. 



125 show = Skr. f^Tii, VI. cl. Tk^T^, Pr- T^T, H. f^|. 



126 f^^^ or to appear = Skr. T^I see, Passive -^^l, Pr. f^^T or 



(K C. 3, 161), H. f3[;^ or fit . 



127 ^ ffive = Skr. ^r, Passive ^^r^ (used actively), Pr. -^i: (Cvv. p. 99, 



H. C. 4, 238), H. or In Pr. also VI. cl. ^ (Spt. v. 2i6), 

 H. deest. 



128 see = Skr. "^H , Future ^f'^rfw (used in sense of present), Pr. '^^i; 

 (H. C. 4, 181), H. See introductory remarks.* 



129 'V^X^place or seize = Skr. Tg', I. cl. ^xTff (seize) or ^I?:^ (place), Pr. ^ij^-?; 



(H. C. 4, 234), H. NT. 



130 or ■KI^ sinlc, he pierced, run into = Skr. s^'T , I. cl. h^wn, Pr. 

 tf^'?; or t^^i; (Pingala in R. M. p. 118, said to be a substitute for 

 ^T^ffT), H. ■??t or ^t. 



131 NT^vq hold = Skr. Causal ■KfK^^ffT, Pr. 'SfTT or VI. cl. 'SfKl^, H. 'i^T. 



132 iff was/i = Skr. 'eiT\, I. cl. m^ffr (or 'V, VI. cl. W^), Pr. '§1^1^ 



(Dl. p. 77) or (with euphonic ) %5ri:, or y^^x (Spt. v. 183, 

 283) or (H. C. 4, 238), H. or -^it. 



* The Skr. conjunct may in Pr. iDecome ^ or =^ . This will explain the 

 origin of the synonyms of which are enumerated in H. C. 4, 181 ; viz., with 



^ are formed =Skr. ^^^T^fiT (from root ^^-'S'S!:) ; the same, contracted, 



becomes (with for see H. C. 1,172); and the latter, expanded, 



becomes ^^^'S; (with for ^T, see my Comp. Gramm. § 48). With are 

 formed ^^^J'^?; = Skr. ^^Sf^fw (for ^^^^i:, with euphonic see H. C. I, 180), 

 and f«i^-^I^ = Skr. f^SJ'^flT (from f'T-'S'SI ). Again appears to he softened in 

 which is probably identical with ^W^I'^^. From the manner in whi^ 

 Hemachandra places T"^^ between f^^^^i; and ^^^-^■1^, it would almost seem 

 as if he looked upon it as a contraction of ^^"^T = Skr. '^JiWif^ (of ^-'S'S! ). In. 

 classical Sanskrit the future of ■€"SJ takes the irregular guna ^ (instead of 

 see Panini VI, 1, 58) ; but in the ordinary speech, no doubt, both forms ^^f^ and 

 ^■^fw were used. It is the latter of the two, from which the Prakrit forms are 

 derived; thus (not — '^^"^^^) ^^^^^ffT. The alterna- 



tive form of f^^'^^ would be 'f'f^^'?; ; this seems to be intended by the form 

 in Vr. 8, 69 (with ^ disaspirated for ^). The Pr. ^T^T. is regularly 

 formed from Skr. ■q^SffT = Pr. (see Delius Jtacl. Frew.) or Tre^ (H. C. 1, 



43) ; and Pr. ^^^T^T is the Skr. ^^Wf<T. In Marathi', the Pr. root becomes 

 W\- The Pr. ^#riT is derived from Skr. ■Slf^T^T^^ffT (with contracted to 



sec my Comp. G-ramm. § 122) ; and Pr. 'R'^"?'?; is probably a mere corruption of it. 

 None of all these forms, as far as I am aware, has left any representative in modern 

 Hindi. 



G 



