57 



341 



Table IV. 



n^. 4101.7 Å f6-^'2\ 



displ. (J 1 ; lOÜ 000 Volt cM) = 1,08 À 



Transition J 



II 



r,. 











int. obs. 



Hed 



Blue 





222 





002 







2 



2 



u 









Q 











321 





101 



4 



2 



2 







.o08 







ooOl 







1 



0,67 



0,67 





321 





011 



8 



3 



1 







.o27 



Q 



.oo07 







1 2 



85 



0,81 





312 





002 



12 



3 



] 







.o20 



Q 



oo04 







1 .'S 



93 



1,01 



Par. 



411 





101 



If) 



3 



1 







ol6 



() 



.oo03 







1 2 



71 



92 





411 





011 



20 



4 







^ 



.o45 







.oo20 







1)1 



0,80 



0,71 





402 





002 



24 



4 











o60 







Q 



2 8 



1 42 



1,37 





501 





101 



28 



4 











o66 



o43 



oo44 



.üol9 





1 80 



2,00 





501 







32 







— 1 







Q 



Q 



Q 













222 





011 



2 



2 



1 



1 



.028 







.üoOS 







1,3 



0,92 



0,89 





213 





002 \, 



Ü 



2 



1 



1 



.036 







.ool3 







) V- 



1,52 



1,52 





321 





002/ 



6 



3 



2 



—1 



.017 







.ooO:! 











312 





101 



10 



2 



1 



1 



.033 







.ooll 









1,23 



1 22 





312 





011 



14 



3 







1 



.023 







.oo05 







1 



0,71 



o,(;o 



Peip. 



303 





002\ 



18 



3 







1 



.049 







.0024 







) .,0 



1,12 



1,14 





411 





002/ 



18 



4 



1 





.013 







.0002 















402 





101 



22 



3 







1 



.051 



.()4!> 



.oo2(; 



.(io24 



2,4 



1,30 



1,30 





402 





Oll 



26 



4 



—1 



1 



















1,3 



0,89 (?) 



0,85(?) 





.-,01 





002 



30 



5 







-1 



.006 







.0(00.-. 







K?) 



0,73 (?) 



0,67 (?) 



ineasuremenls on the inten.sities of the components. Components the appearance of 

 which was regarded by Stahk as questionable are indicated by a ? sign. 



On the whole it will be seen, that it is possible on Bohh's theory to account 

 in a convincing way for the intensities of the Stark eftecl components. Before dis- 

 cussing in detail each of the lines observed by Stakk, however, it may be useful 

 to insert some general remarks to which a closer consideration of the preceding 

 tables naturally gives rise. 



In the first place it will be observed that the agreement between theory and 

 experiments revealed by these tables is intimately connected with the circumstance 

 that we have disregarded stationary states for which n^ ----- 0, /. e. for which the 

 angular momentum of the electron round an axis through the nucleus parallel 

 to the electric force would be equal to zero (compare page 50). In fact, if such 

 states were taken into account (it follows from what has been said in the note on 

 page 50 that, due to the influence of the relativity modifications, the formulae 

 (70) and (71) would not be applicable to the states in question) we should expect 

 the appearance of a number of additional comi)onenls of rather strong intensities; 

 the absence of such components may be considered as an experimental confirmat- 

 ion of the non-existence of stationary slates of the type under consideration. Further 



1). K. I). VIdensk. Sclsk. Skr., naturvldcnsk. og ninthein. .\(d., 8. Kække, III. 3. 44 



