2 



to it). I regard 1t aa glanduloaa and thlnk that in Chapman the 

 long reourved branohea probably meana aplnea? 



3. very eplny.without flowera, oould perhapa be a form of tomentoaa, al- 

 though entirely amooth. - Ia to me very queationable« 



4. very apiny t with fruita, rem! nda me of arboresoena,but rather be longa 

 to punctata. 



5 is miaaing. 



6 rau 3t be C.toraentosa. 



7 with the two-aeeded frulta ia the aame« 



8 If the fruita lylng looaely in th oover belong to it,haa 3 nuaulea, 

 ia entirely amooth and ungueaaable to me; perhapa it belongs to the 

 polymorphous tomentoaa. 



9 wlthout flowera and fruita, oould perhapa be aeatlvalia,whiah I do not 

 know very well. The ycung ahoota look very a t ränge, etipjilae amall and 

 linear; ia very dubioua. 



10 could be a form of Corriaoe. 



U seema to be C.oooolnea f although it haa often only 3-4 aeeda, aee below. 

 12 and 13 X regard both aa oooolnea 



14 C.spathulata 



15 CCrus Galli 



16 and 1? Crat.Crua Galli 



19 with ita few flowered oorvmba and neotln ate glandulär oalyx lobea seema 

 to belong to C . glandulo aa . though the leavea would aoaroely allow that: 

 atlll I plaoe it with that form . 



11 I have examlned thia plant again and I am aoiaewhat dubioua about itj 



I de not know any oooolnea with leaa than 5 aeeda, and flowera in large 

 oorymba. Thla haa 3-5 aeeda and the flowera more apart. I thought of 

 C. flava, but for that the plant ia not glandulär enough. But if you get 

 atook,you ahould try next year,to preaerve it with flowera and mature 

 (rlpe) fruita. 



