1902.] 



" Blaze-cu rrents " of the Crystalline Lens. 



201 



Then photo. 4248— 



5000 + 



+ 



Exp. 19. Cat.— Lens. 



1st lens 



1J hour post mortem. 

 5000 + 



Response abolished by compression. 



2nd lens 5000 + 

 ?? 



f Same lens + 

 1 next morning - 



Exp. 20. Mackerel. — Lens. Eeputed fresh. 



1000 + 



5000 + 



10000 + 



Responses homodrome throughout. 

 Exp. 21. 5th Codfish. — Lens. 



1st lens 5000 + 



10000- 

 + 



2nd lens 10000 + 



-0-0010 

 -0-0014 

 -0-0005 

 -0-0008 



-0-0003 

 -0-0008 



-0-0002 

 -0-000G 



- trace 

 + trace 



+ 0-0002 

 -0-0001 

 + 0-0003 

 -0-0004 

 + 0-000.4 

 -0-0006 



-0-0002 



+ 0-0001, -0-0002 

 -0-0006 



-0-0002, +0-0003 



-0-0001 



+ 0-0001 



Attempts were made to test the last two lenses by lateral eye rota- 

 tion ; the results were uncertain and variable. Similar trials in other 

 cases were equally variable. 



Exp. 22. Cat. — Lens. 5 hours post mortem. 



1st lens. Initial current + ■ 001 1 



1000 + and - gave nil, nil. 



5000 + 

 2nd lens 5000 + 

 5000- 



Exp. 23. Brill— Lens (1 24 hours). 

 Initial current 



Exc. by single break 1000 + 



0-0004 and nil. 

 0-0015 



>0-0030 (off scale). 



0-0036 

 0-0020 



Q 2 



