762 



THE AMERICAN NATURALIST. [Vol. XXXVII. 



Still another major difference between the forms in general 

 habit is that of the method of branching and the growth of the 

 branches. In (E. la ma irk tana, the branches from the basal por- 

 tion of the shoot were of a length amounting to more than half 

 that of the shoot which is also true of (E. rubrinervis. The 

 upper branches of the former remain short and stout however, 

 while those of rubrinervis attain greater lengths which decrease 

 upwardly so that a plant may have a roughly globular outline. 



The majority of the features in which the mutant departs 

 from the parent, as described above, are of a nature that would 

 equip the new form for living under more arid conditions than 

 the parent, although the actual endurance of rubrinervis to 

 decreased supply of moisture was not tested. So far as this 

 single observation goes then, it is to be seen that the new char- 

 acters of mutants are harmonious in their adaptive relations. 



(E)iothera rubrinervis originated in deVries' cultures in 1899, 

 and has also appeared by independent mutations since that time. 

 It has been found to be independent and self-maintenant in 

 competition with the parent form. 



A large number of flower buds in both rubrinervis and 

 Itimarckiaua were pierced by some insect, and the larvae coming 



the abnormal enlargement of the buds and capsules, which failed 



e successive crops of seedlings of (Enothera 

 iicative of the fact that the mutating period of 

 not yet been passed. No departures from the 

 re found among the individuals which have come 

 :o this time in the New York Botanical Garden, 

 f the seedlings of (E. lamarekiaua are easily dis- 



at the age of five months were distinctly 

 laminae relatively narrower. Adult basal 



