1 1(1 



DR. ('. W. ANDREWS ON THE 



PalcBornastodon beadnelti, Andrews.* 



The Skull (figs. LO and Ll). — Unfortunately no perfect specimen of the skull has 

 vet been found, and the most complete example wants the w hole of the cranial, and 

 nmst of the facial region ; from this the following points can be determined. Owing 

 to the very brachydont character of the molars, the maxilla' are low and their zygo- 

 matic processes rise a very short distance above the alveolar border, and over the 

 second true molar. The jugal extends forwards and is a much more important factor 

 of the zygomatic arch than in Elephas or Tetrabelodon : posteriorly its relations to 



Figs. 10 and 11. — Skull of hthcownsfwhii bfwhu'Ui , ANDREWS. Upper Eocene. Egypt. 



the squamosal are the same as in those genera. The glenoid surface is like that of 

 Elephas : there is no post-glenoid process, but a post-tympanic flange of the squamosal 



* 'Geological Magazine,' dec. TV, vol. 8 (1901), p. 401. 



