IS 



part or 1 angle ' is continued more directly from the inner end of the condyle, and, being 

 broken away, its base constitutes the ridge which runs forward, bounding below the large 

 shallow depression on the inner side of the ascending ramus. Viewing the under surface of 

 that ramus in Sarcophilus and Thylacinus, the flattened plane formed by the inbent angle 

 inclines from without inward and rather downward (see Cut, fig. 5, p. 73); in Phasrolofhe- 

 Hum the nI<>]>< of (lie same part is rather upward and inward; so that it needs the mylo- 

 hyoid groove {(/) and symphysis (s) to convince one that it is the inner and not the outer 

 surface of the ramus which is exposed. The entry to the dental canal (d) is more advanced 

 in position than in the existing Australian genera above cited. The coronoid process in 

 direction and proportion and in the depth of the notch between it and the condyle resem- 

 bles that in Thylacinus more than that of Sarcophilus; but the anterior border is more 

 convex, the fore-and-aft breadth is relatively greater, and the posterior apex a little more 

 produced. In the gentle curve by which the lower margin of the mandible is continued to 

 the incisive alveoli, Phascolotherium more resembles Phascoyale than it does Thylacinus or 

 Sarcophilus. 



The mylohyoid groove is narrow and sharply defined ; it runs from below the entry 

 of the dental canal almost straight forward and downward, terminating at the under 

 border below the third molar tooth; it has been mistaken for a suture, and looks very 

 like one, but the bottom of the groove is entire. In size this fossil mandibular ramus 

 equals that of the existing marsupial Phascoyale pcnicilla/a. 



The specimen of Phascolotherium Bucklandi above described is in the British 

 Museum. 



§ V. — Genus — Stereognathus, Charlesworth} 1854. 

 Species — Stereognathus ooliticus, Ch. PI. I, figs. 27 — 30. 



The fact of a genus and species distinct from any mammalian fossil at that time got 

 from deposits of Mcsozoic age was made known by Edward Charlesworth, Esq., F.G.S., 

 to the Geological Section of the British Association at the meeting at Liverpool in 1854. 

 Hut there appears to be no record of generic or specific characters. 



The fossil itself was submitted to me for description, 2 at Mr. Charlesworth's instance, 

 by its possessor, the Rev. J. P. B. Dennis, M.A., F.G.S. It consists of a portion of jaw- 

 wit h teeth imbedded in a slab of the Oolitic slate of Stonesfield, Oxfordshire. 



The portion of bone exposed to view is about nine lines in extent, and is part of a 

 ramus of the lower jaw, containing three molar teeth (PI. I, figs. 27 and 27 a). It is 

 nearly straight ; the side exposed is convex vertically, which indicates it to be the outer 

 side ; a slight increase of vertical diameter towards the end (a) indicates it to be part of a 



1 'Report Brit. Assoc' (Liverpool), 1854, Rep. Sect., p. 80. 



2 See 'Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London,' vol. xiii (18.>7), pp. 1, See., pi. i. 



