340 



2ist September, igio. 



Sir, — In reply to your letter dated 29tli July, No. 392/09, I am 

 instructed to enquire whether any exemptions have been granted in 

 Kuala Langat District to any employers of Tamil Labour? 



I have etc., 

 Your obedient servant, 

 (Sgd.) ^. Macfadyen, 



Hon. Secretary. 



No. 392/09. ■ Klang, 6th October, igio. 



Sir, — With referancc to your letter of the 21st September, and 

 previous correspondence including my No. 392/09, I have the honour 

 to inform you that I am not aware that any estate in the Kuala 

 Langat District has been exempted. 



I have etc., 

 Your obedient servant, 

 (Sgd.) G. A. Smith-Steinmetz, 

 Ag. Assist. Supt. of Immigts., F.M.S. 



I2th September, 1910. 



Sir, — I have the honour to acknowledge, with thanks, receipt of 

 your letter of 6th instant. No. 392/09, in reply to my letter of the 2lst 

 ultimo. 



I regret that in my previous letter I apparently failed to make 

 myself clear. The information I v/as instructed to ask you as to be 

 so good as to supply, was to whether exemption has been granted to 

 any employer of Tamil labour in the district. I should not have 

 restricted my enquiry to the owners of European Estates. 



I have etc., 

 Your obedient servant, 

 (Sgd). E. Macfadyen, 



Hon. Secretary. 



No. 392/09. Klang, 1 2th October, 191 0. 



Sir, — In continuation of my letter No. 392/09 of the 6th October, 

 on the subject of exemption from hospital accomodation in the Kuala 

 Langat District, I have the honour to inform you that I am not aware 

 that any exemption whatever has been granted. 



I have etc., 

 Your obedient servant, 

 (Sgd.) G. A. Smith-Steinmetz, 

 Ag. Assist. Supt. of Immigts., F.M.S. 



