PROCEEDINGS OF UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUJVI. 225 



Although the descriptions of Linnaeus are unequivocal and based 

 solely on specimens of Pterophryne, in the synonymy above copied are 

 confused several species. As he seems, however, only to have known 

 through autopsy the species of Pterophryne, and to have been unpre- 

 pared for the polymorphous character of the type, his confusion under 

 the synonymy is not at all to be wondered at, and is paralleled by many 

 modern naturalists, especially Giinther. His compatriot, Osbeck, had 

 also the same species of Pterophryne in view in his description* of the 

 Lophius histrio, viz : — 



"Die Flossquabbe, Lophius Histrio L. S. N. Lophius tumidus Mus. 

 Reg. p. 56, und Linn. Westgoth. Reise Tab. 3, Fig. 3, aber der Faden 

 und die erste Eiickenflossfeder sind an den Spitzen borstig, die Borsten 

 "welch. Der ganze Korper ist mit einer schleimigen Haut, und kleinen 

 bliittrigen Stutzen (fitlcris) bedeckt, die man ausser dem Wasser kaum 

 bemerkt, weil sie fest anschliessen. Der Rachen und Bauch sind gross, 

 damit sie viele Krebsarten oder junge Krebse verschlingeu konnen. 

 Vielleicht hat die Vorsicht diesen Fisch deswegen so blattrig geklcidet, 

 damit ihn die Raubfische mit dem Seegrasse verwechseln und nicht gar 

 ausrotteu mochten." 



The smooth skin and the tag-like appendages evidently proclaim the 

 fish of Osbeck to be a Pterophryne. 



It is also to be remarked that the naturalist who first recognized spe- 

 cific differentiation among the Antennariids (Shaw), in his "General 

 Zoology" (v. 5, p. 384, pi. 164), restricted the name to the Pterophryne, 

 and gave, under the term Lophius histrio, a quite recognizable figure of 

 that form, whose only great fault is the delineation of the first spine. 



II. 



The names subsequently applied to Pterophryne now demand consid- 

 eration. 



Those accepted by the latest systematists have been attributed to 

 Bloch's Systema Ichthyologiae, edited by Schneider, but, as will presently 

 be shown, erroneously. 



In the Systema Ichthyologiae (p. 142) only one species of Antennariids 

 is admitted under the name Lophius histrio, but four varieties are distin- 

 guished under it, viz : — 



Var. a, "Striated Loph. Shaw Miscell. No. 58" ; 



Var. h,pictus; 



Var. c, marmoratus ; and 



Var. d, ocellatus. 



As no references have been made to previous publications, except in 

 case of var. a, it seems to have been generally assumed that the varietal 

 names originated in the work in question. This, however, is not the 

 case. 



* Osbeck, Peter. Reise nach Ostindien und China. 8vo. Rostock, 17C5. p. 400. 



Proc. Nat. Mus. 78 15 ©ee. 9, 1878. 



