-5- 



^p iobba was accepted by Linnaeus (1771) in a different 



sense than used in Stickman's thesis. 



Canarium and Casuarina are validly published by 



r .r~. 



Lmnaeus m the r-epaa-bi^G^tXGn— Stickman's thesis in the 



(/?$«) 



Amoenitates Academicae . This second edition of Stickman's 



*\ 



thesis reproduces what appeared in the first edition but 

 with three major additions, Tomus 7 of Rumphius (published 

 in 1755) i . ? o ddo t i, a systematic listing in Linnaean 

 sequence (titled "Flora Amboinensis")^ i.s . adde d, and an 

 appendix i^-^d-ed at the end. It is the Appendix that is 

 of greatest interest (p. 143). The Appendix appears to be 

 made up of two parts, Palmae and Singulares . I believe 

 that the word "Appendix" was erroneously inserted before 

 Palmae instead of after it. If one looks at the Species 

 Plantarum of Linnaeus, the Palmae follow the Cryptogamia 

 (ed. 1, p. 1187). In any case it is the Singulares /hat ^ 



are of great interest: 



Rumph. vol. Plates 



Soccus 1 30-34 



Dur io 1 2 9 



Canarius 2 47-54 



Casuarina equisetifolia ' e^jeffj^ 3 57 



Canarium indicum 2 47-56 



Lens phaseoloides - 5 4 



Alopecuro-veronica Fl, Zeyl. 6 16 



Myr is tica 2 4-9 



Fseudo - sandalum 2 12 



