RUTACEAE 



293 



Roxb. is apparently quite the same as Camunium vulgare 

 Rumph. ; while Murray a scandens Hassk., which does not appear 

 in Index Kewensis, must be typified wholly by the Rumphian 

 figure and description. The forms mentioned by Hasskarl, Neue 

 Schliissel (1866) 91, as Camunium javanicum and Camunium e 

 Macassar are both probably referable to Murraya paniculata 

 (Linn.) Jack as here interpreted. 



FERONIA Correa 



FERONIA LIMONIA (Linn.) Swingle in Journ. Wash. Acad. Sci. 4 (1914) 



328. 



Schinus limonia Linn. Sp. PL (1753) 389. 



Limonia acidissima Linn. Sp. PI. ed. 2 (1762) 554. 



Feronia elephantum Correa in Trans. Linn. Soc. 5 (1800) 225. 



Anisifolium Rumph. Herb. Amb. 2: 133, t. U3. 



Nothing resembling Anisifolium appears in our Amboina col- 

 lections. Regarding the Rumphian figure, Swingle states that 

 it is "the wood apple or a very closely allied species." Linnaeus 

 made the reduction to his Schinus limonia, in Stickman Herb. 

 Amb. (1759) 9, Amoen. Acad. 4 (1759) 121, Syst. ed. 10 (1759) 

 1034, and in his Species Plantarum, ed. 2 (1762) 554, to Limonia 

 acidissima, the latter reduction being followed by most authors. 

 Hamilton placed it under Feronia elephantum Corr., while Hass- 

 karl places it under Hesperethusa acidissima Roem., a synonym 

 of Feronia limonia (Linn.) Swingle. Rumphius's material was 

 from Java where the species is still cultivated. 



AEGLE * Correa 



AEGLE MARMELOS (Linn.) Correa in Trans. Linn. Soc. 5 (1800) 223. 

 Crataeva marmelos Linn. Sp. PI. (1753) 444. 

 Bilacus marmelos O. Kuntze Rev. Gen. PI. 1 (1891) 98. 

 Bilacus Rumph. Herb. Amb. 1: 197, t. 81. 

 Bilacus taurinus Rumph. Herb. Amb. 1: 199. 



This reduction of Bilacus was first made by Linnaeus, in 

 Stickman Herb. Amb. (1754) 8, Amoen. Acad. 4 (1759) 120, 

 Sp. PI. ed. 2 (1762) 637, and is certainly the correct disposition 

 of it. It was described and figured from cultivated specimens. 



I am unable definitely to place Bilacus amboinensis silvestris 

 Rumph., Herb. Amb. 1 : 200, t. 28. It was erroneously reduced 

 by Linnaeus, in Stickman Herb. Amb. (1754) 8, Amoen. Acad. 

 4 (1759) 120, to Crataeva tapia Linn. Hamilton suggested that 

 it might be an undescribed species of Aegle, but this is improb- 

 able. The figure strongly resembles Crataeva religiosa Forst., 



* Retained name, Brussels Congress; Belou Adans. (1763) is older. 



