84 



Herman Scholtz, 



1i713 rectang J with 2 •*... 12™ sf nr on the same par; * 9 U 10 np. 



1x714 am the faintest of the 4 th order; d* (9 m ,5 and 10 ra ; dist ab 1) f ab min nr 

 in the par. 



Nova VI an insignificant object; p h 721 ab 68 s and 160" s; *a 10 m f ,2 and 135" n. 

 1x721 similar to 1x711 and inconsiderably Fr. 



1x724: ab 2' lg and '/ 2 ' br. Axe of E np to sf : pos(by measure,) = 112° (diffic). Sev 

 knots or *... momentarily glimmering through in M? C condens consequently v 

 indistinct. Sky not very favourable. 



It 737 not inconsiderably Br than 1x13d; *a 8 m ,5 np. 



1x739 trap with 3 f *... , relative positions determined. Neb not Br than CI. II. Why 

 in SN the epithet "splendens" is employed, I can not conceive? I agree in the 

 remarks of D'A: "qua ratione milky anno 1784, non intelligo", as the C part deci- 

 dedly makes the impression of an unresolved • Neb 2' or more E nr in the 

 decl-circle; but the extreme part eF. U: "vF spiral with B centre; S * sf centre 

 involved ; two others following." 



h751,753 carefully but in vain searched for 1866 Apr. 8; nor seen 1863 Apr. 9; but 

 the same year Apr. 17 I seem, according to the journal, to have seen at least a F 

 trace of them, although sky v bad and the B neb h 748 looked vF. This obs 

 quite certainly erroneous — the telescope probably was pointed to a false region? 

 In Fh.Tr.61 there is nevertheless mention made of a "triple neb." Query wether 

 the objects in question be var or do not exist? 



1x754 has evident traces of r, although seen in bad air. 



h757: traces of C r or 2 C *... ? 



Ii758 is Sr but inconsiderably Fr than the p neb. 



h761 not so vF, but only once obs in bad air, and then diffic. 



h773: irreg C indistinctly seen — perhaps sev *... ? 



h775: *a 10 ,n sf. 



11.403 the brightest and best defined of the 3 in the vicinity. 



11.494 E nr in the par, indistinct and without C condens. Place that of *a ll m 12 



in f end of the neby; * ll m sf *a; * 13 m in p part of the neby. 

 1.118 appears not to be capable of an exact determination. 

 Rem. Identification according to SN. 



1x 784 inconsiderably Fr than K500 and 501; *, a little Br than the C of neb, nf. 



