Observations of 500 Nebulae. 103 

 11.249: * 10™,5 np v troublesome. 



1x2201: 2 «... ll m and ll m 12 s ; a rectang J of f the neb. 

 1x2204: isosc J witb 2 B «... : 8°4984 (8'") nf, *a 9 m ,5 sf 



M#05 bas 3 *... inv: »b 12"13 nr C and looking like a N ; »a ll m 12and *c 13™ at 

 tbe ends of neby, which is E in direction bet these two *... Place refers to *b. 



1x2214 with traces of C r ; * 13'" at the m s from N, *a 12 m sp. 

 h2221 in vain sought for 1867 Nov. 29. 



h2215 E sp to nf in pos ab = 45°; * 13" f. 



1x2210 E np to sf in measured position = 99°,5 ; *a ll m 12 sf, which the neby reaches ; 

 sev S *... in the neby. 



h2217 probably sev *... in M? *a 10" sf. 



1x2218; 1x2210; I) A Nova; ENova. 



1x2218 in a region rich in *... • 2 B *... p, F * sf. 



h 2219 (=GC. 4912) E sp to nf in pos ab = 45°; *ll'"sp. 



D'ANova (=GC.4913) nr in the same decl-circle with 1x2219; * 10 m np, *13 m sp. 

 The B * v troublesome. 



ENova (=GC.4915) ab 1' n from U2219 al f, looks nr like 1)2218; not obs, but 

 no doubt observable in favourable circumstances. 



Rem. A poor * gr of pretty B *... follows the above neb ab 1 '/ 2 min ; 

 and the whole region f this *gr seems nebs : a gr of S neb or a considerably 

 extended neby with sev knots? As yet the sky was not sufficiently dark, and neby 

 vF and indistinct , no decision could be arrived at. This neby independently 

 remarked in the autumns 1867 and 1869, as on the second occasion the elder 

 notice was forgotten. Description and position do not at all agree with III. 181! 



1x2221 searched for in vain 1867 Nov. 29; obs by R, but not seen by D'A. 



1x 2222; 1x 2223; III. 238. 



h2222 not eF, yet considerably Fr than h2223. 

 h2223 looks nr like K2222, although considerably Br; *a 10™ sf. 

 Ill 238 al Br and more easy than h 2222. F * in the sp part of neby? A file of 

 F •*... nr in the same decl-circle f the neb. 



