388 



A. TERAO : 



traça, p. 1 146; Stcbbing, Hist. Crust., 1893, p. 159; Alcock, Cat. Ind. 

 Dec. Crust., pt. 2, fase. 1, 1905, p. 139. 



Cœnobita eavipes Stimpson. 



C cenobita eavipes, Stimpson, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philad., 1858, 

 p. 245 ; and Smiths. Misc. Coll., XLIX, 1907, p. 200 ; de Man, Abh. 

 Senckenb. Nat. Ges., xxiv, 1902, p. 743, pi. xxiv, fig. 46 ; Alcock, 

 Cat. Ind. Dec. Crust., pt. 2, fase. 1, 1905, p. 146, pi. xiv, fig. 1. 



C. violascens, Heller, (Verh. zool. bot. Ges. Wien, xil, 1862, 

 p. 524) ; and Novara Crust.. 1865, p. 82, pi. viii, fig. 1 ; Hilgendorf, 

 in v. d. Decken's Reisen Ost-Afr., Ill, i, 1869, p. 99, pi. vi, fig. 3b ; 

 de Man, Arch. f. Nat., LUI, 1887, i, p. 453; and Journ. Linn. Soc. 

 Zool., xxil, 1888, p. 255. 



C. compressa, Miers, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 5, v, 1880, p. 371. 



C. compressus, Ortmann, Zool. Jahrb., Syst., vi, 1892, p. 318, 

 pl. xii, fig. 23 ; Henderson, Trans. Linn. Soc., Zool., V, 1893, p. 410 ; 

 Borradaile, Stomatop. and Macr. Willey's Exp., 1899, pp. 396, 397, 

 198, 425 ; Lanchester, P. Z. S., 1902, II, p. 368. 



Note: This species may be only a varietal form of C. rugosus. But no specimen on hand 

 stands quite in harmony with Stimpson's description of that species. Therefore, it had 

 better be placed distinct from it until a larger supply of materials makes possible 

 a thorough revision of these Coenobite forms. 



Cœnobita hilgendorfi, n. nom. 



Cœnobita cly peata, Latreille, (Fam. Nat. Règne Anim., 1826, 

 p. 277); Milne-Edwards, Hist. Nat. Crust., II, 1837, P- 2 39 > Dana, 

 U. S. Expl. Exp. Crust., pt. 1, 1852, p. 473, pi. xxx, fig. 4; Heller, 

 Novara Crust., 1865, p, 82 ; Miers, Ann. Mag. Nat., ser. 5, V, 1880, 

 p. 371; Henderson, Challenger Anomura, 1888, p. 51. 



C. clypcatus, Hilgendorf, in v. d. Decken's Reisen in Ost-Afr., 

 Ill, i, 1869, p. 98, pi. vi, fig. 3c 4a ; de Man, Arch. f. Nat, LIU, i, 

 1887, p. 452 ; and Abh. Senckenb. Nat. Ges., XXV, 1902, p. 741, 



