NOMENCLATURE. 201 



VI. NOMENCLATURE. 1 

 1883. 



1. On Trinomial Nomenclature. <Zodlogist, 3d ser., VII, pp. 97-100, March, 1883. 



1884. 



2. 'Are Trinomials Necessary? ' < Auk, I, pp. 102-104, pp. 200-202, Jan. and April, 



1884. 



Replies to this question, raised by Montague Chamberlain (ibid., pp. 101-102, 198-200). 



3. 'Can We not have a Simpler System of Nomenclature?' <Auk, I, pp. 297-300, 



July, 1884. 



A letter of this title and editorial reply. 



4. "A Lay View of 'Ornithophilologicalities.'" <Auk, I, pp. 300-304, July, 1884. 



An editorial reply to a letter of this title. 



.5. Zoological Nomenclature. <Auk, I, pp. 338-353, Oct., 1884. 



On trinomial nomenclature, with particular reference to the views and practices of English 

 ornithologists, apropos of a discussion of the "Expediency, or otherwise, of adopting Trinomial 

 Nomenclature in Zoology," held in the Lecture Room of the Natural History Museum, 

 London, July 2, 1884. 



•6. Stejneger on Trinomials in American Ornithology. <Auk, I, pp. 381-382, Oct., 

 1884. 



Review of Dr. L. Stejneger's paper of this title (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., VII, 1884, pp. 

 70-81, July 1, 1884), in which the history of trinomials is briefly given. 



1887. 



7. [The Antedating of papers and works on Natural History.] <Auk, IV, p. 176, 

 April, 1887, and ibid., p. 270, July, 1887. 



With special reference to the 'Proceedings' and other publications of the U. S. National 

 Museum. 



1890. 



:8. Waterhouse's 'Index Generum Avium.' <Auk, VII, pp. 71-73, Jan., 1890. 



Review of F. H. Waterhouse's work of this title (8vo, London, 1889), with criticisms of 

 omissions and defects, as the omission of all generic names founded before 1766, except 

 Rrisson's, and the giving of vernacular French names the status of proper generic terms. 



■9. Blanchard on the Nomenclature of Organized Beings. <Auk, VII, pp. 73-74, 

 Jan., 1890. 



Review of Dr. Raphael Rlanchard's report 'De la Nomenclature des etres organizes,' 

 presented to the International Congress of Zoology (Reports to the Congress, pp. 87-157, 

 July, 1889). Comment on some of the rulings in the report. 



1 With reference mainly to the general subject, and exclusive of special cases (Kerr, Oken, Pennant, 

 •etc.) and of incidental references in reviews and papers devoted chiefly to other subjects. 



