322 



The Society's MSS.—Chiseldon. 



i 



Robert Walker for Badbury Farm 



08. 



17. 



02. 



Henry Coster for all M r . Calley's 



08. 



10. 



07. 



John Herring for Bailey's Snod hill 



01. 



02. 



OOf 



John Herring for Scoles's 



01. 



03. 



03. 



John Herring for Webb's Snod hill 



00. 



07. 



06. 



Thomas Smart for M rs . Morse's 



04. 



16. 



03. 



Thomas Smart for his own 



03. 



19. 



04. 



John Liddiard Esq r . for his Upper Farm 



05. 



00, 



00. 



Widow Skinner for M r . Liddiard's Snod hill 



05. 



10. 



00. 



Thomas Herring for his own 



01. 



08. 



00. 



Thomas Prince for M rs . Morse's Snod hill 



03. 



05. 



03. 



Thomas Prince for Cresby's Snod hill 



01. 



01. 



04. 



John Lovelock or his tenant 



00. 



12. 



08. 



Widow Cox & widow Skinner for Stamp's 



04. 



11. 



08. 



Widow Cox for y e widow Baker's 



00. 



05. 



02. 



Robert Walker for his own 



00. 



05. 



02. 



Robert Walker for y e widow Robins's 



00. 



05. 



02. 



Thomas Richens for M rs . Wake's 



01. 



11. 



08. 



Thomas Richens for Cresby's 



00. 



10. 



01. 



Thomas Richens for M r . Greenfield's grounds 



00. 



18. 



08. 



Thomas Smart for one part of Cresby's 



00. 



13. 



04. 



Anthony Allen for his own 



03. 



09. 



01. 



Thomas Smart for Charles Horton's 



00. 



04. 



00. 



Ralph May for Harding's meads 



00. 



14. 



09. 



Ralph May for Garner's close 



00. 



02. 



00. 



John Savory for Dearham's 



00. 



02. 



00. 



Anthony Tidcomb for M r . Hardyman's 



02. 



09. 



00. 



Stfmhpn Milps 



00. 



06. 



03. 



Thomas Dance 



00. 



06. 



03. 



Charles Naish for Bailey's Close 



00. 



02. 



00. 





79. 



18. 



00. 



Sum Total 179. 05. 00. 



Edward Carpenter \ Assesors & 

 Henry Costar J Collectors. 



Pleydell Goddard 

 Go: Smith 

 Ric: ffranklyn 

 Wm. Calley 



The following brief memorandum represents the most vital, and 

 the most beneficent, change in the village economy in the whohj 

 course of its written history. We have seen (No. 2) the conditions 

 under which the vicar lived as concerned his glebe. Applied tc 

 the whole parish the same immemorial drawback to rational 

 cultivation was well-nigh intolerable. The inolosure awards 



