76 Bibliography of Stoneherige and Avebury. 



Keane. A. H. [b. 1833]: Professor of Hindustani 

 1895. Ethnology; 8vo., xxx., 442 : Cambridge. 



1890. Second Edition. 



Stonehenge was originally the work of Neolithic man. and was a menhir- 

 surrounded tumulus. Afterwards there came invaders (Kelts) from the 

 east, and these "may very well have adapted such cyeloliths as Avebury 

 and Stonehenge to the solar colt." [See chap, vi., pp. 123 — 140, .\a>li(liic 

 a nd Metal Ages.] Compares Stonehenge and the great tumulus at New 

 Grange, in Ireland. 



Keate, Geo. [1729—1797]: Artist and author. 



Made drawings of Stonehenge in 1770. These were engraved l»y 11. 

 Roberts for Easton, cf Salisbury. 



Kell, Rev. E. 1865. Stonbhenge. Gent's Mag., 486 — 488. 



Supports the theory that the monument was raised "to commemorate the 

 massacre of the British nobles by Hengist." 



Kelly, W. K. 1863. Curiosities of [ndo-Eubopean Tradition 

 and Folk-Lorb : 8vo., xii., 308 : London. 



See Chap. II. — fire and the sun. "For the Germans at Least bhe wheel 

 was an emblem of the sun." 



Kemble, J. M [1807—1857]: Philologist and historian. 

 [Edited by]. A.I). 604 — 1060, C. CODEX DlPLOMATICUS .Kyi 



Saxonici. Six vols., 8vo. (c. 400 \)\). each). Eng. Hist. Soe. 

 1839—1848. 



These Anglo-Saxon Charters or title-deeds are more than fifteen hundred 

 in number; and frequently give minute particulars about the lands to 

 which they refer. See Vol. V , p. 2H7, for a charter i No. 1 1'20) of AtheUtan. 

 A.l>. 989, believed by Mr. Kemble to contain references to Avebury. 



184S. Saxons in England; two vols., 8vo. : London. 

 L876. New Edition; two vols., 8vo. ; xii.. 535; and [v., 562. 



Uefers to Widukind's account (given in Leibnitz, Her. BrODfiW., [.,78 — 74) 

 of the massacre of the Thuringians by the OldsaxOIie, afl being the original 

 of the story of the treacherous attack upon the Britons bj Hengist ! 

 (Vol. [., p. 16, edition of 1876). 



lttf»7. Noticks of IIkatiikn Intkkmknt iii tin* Codex 



I >i]»loinal icus [„Kvi Saxonici]. Arcluiol. Joum., xiv.. L 19—139. 

 In this Codex the boundaries of estates are defined with an "extraordinary 

 richness of detail." Mr. Kemble thinks that in Cod. Dip. 11*20 there is 

 the "clearest possible allusion to the great stones at Avebury." He then 

 gives a translation of the document, which definei "the DOUndfl of 



