86 Bibliography of Stonehenge and Avebury. 



Crocker's plan of Stonehenge (drawn for Sir R. C. Hoare) is not strictly 

 accurate. Praises Petrie's plans, and states that the only reason why he 

 (Lukis) has drawn a new plan is that the Society " wished to possess one 

 drawn to the same scale as that of other monuments which I have made 

 for them." Many interesting details of the remarkable "constructive 

 ingenuity " exhibited by the builders of Stonehenge are described ; and 

 it is considered to be " unique." 



As to Avebury, Mr. Lukis finds much fault with both Stukeley's plans and 

 theories; and declares that he had " serpent on the brain" ! 



Lukis. Rev. W. C. 1883. Report on the Prehistoric 



MONUMENTS of Wilts, Somerset, and South Wales. Proc. Soc. 

 Antitj., 2 ser„ IX., 344 — 355. 



For Avebury sec pp. 344 — 346 ; Winterbourne-Bassett, p. 347 ; Stanton 

 Drew, 347 — 351. The circle, etc., on Overton (or Hackpen) Hill, had no 

 connection with the Kennet Avenue of stones leading to Avebury. The 

 " Beckhampton Avenue " of Stukeley never existed. 



1885. Prehistoric Stone Monuments — Cobnwall; foL ; 



viii., 31 ; with map and forty coloured plates: London. 

 Thirteen plates of stone circles are given — very valuable for comparison 

 with Stonehenge. 



1885. Egyptian Obelisks, etc. Archasologia. XLVHL, 



421—430. 



The megalithic erections of Brittany " testify to engineering skill of no 

 mean kind," and yet they were constructed by a race having "no knowledge 

 of bronze and iron, neither of these metals having ever been found in their 

 previously undisturbed tombs." 



1888. Megalithic Monuments. Archccol. Review, No. 5 



(July), 352—354 



Denounces Fergusson's book on " Rude Stono Monuments," every copy 

 of which ought to be " committed to the tlames " as a source of error! 



Lynn, W. T. IS'U. Kakuest Mention ok Stonehenge. 



Xo/' s tntil ( t hn rirs, Sth ser., V., L'lM. 

 Assigns this to Geoffrey of Monmouth. 



Lysons, Rev. Sam. [1806 L877]: Antiquary; Canon of 

 Gloucester. 



1865. Our British Ancestors; 8vo., xvi., 555: London and 

 Oxford. 



A general treatise on the subject, in which much use is made of etymology, 

 and of place-names. 



