COKKIGENDA, 



(So far as observed) in the preceding Eight Volumes. 



YOL. I. 



Page 140, note 1, line 2, for " demilions" read " demi-lions." 

 » >} a line 3, /or " Church " read " House." 

 „ 146, note 1. line 4, read " Pieux quoique preux." 



» » » line 20 > cancel two lines, /rom " His son John Long," &c, 



to " estate." For the real facts, see vol. iii., 179. 

 „ 148, note 4, « Horton," cancel the whole note : and see vol. v., 318. 

 „ 152, note 2, last line, for " who " read " whose son." 

 „ 186, note 1. Upon revision of the authority on which William of Eding- 



ton appeared to be a Cheney the evidence is considered insufficient. 



Cancel from line 1 1 of the note, beginning « He appears to have been," 



all down to "in French < Chene.' " 

 „ 188, note, line 11. The letters have been more closely examined, and are 



certainly I. B. They cannot therefore apply to Thomas Bulkington. 

 „ 189, line 7, erase " Pollette » before daughters, and insert it before 



"(Pawlet.)" 

 „ 190, note 1, cancel " Cheney." 



„ 253, lines 2 and 5, for " Plympton " read " Pilton." 



,, 257, line 4, dele " time." 



„ 261, line 7, for " forty," read " fifty-six." 



,, 273, line 24, for " Walter Long, Esq. read "Lord Manvers." 



298, line 21, for 11 1806 " read 11 1608." 

 „ 305, line 8, for « 1582 " read 11 1682." 



„ 309, note 1, line 10, for « Osterhanger » read « Ostenhanger." 



YOL. II. 



Page 28, line 17, for « St. Cecilia" read " St. Edith." 



„ 153, line 18, for " Woodhampton " rea^ " Wedhampton." 

 „ 156, line 14. The Dukes of Bolton never had Earl-stoke. 



275, line 24, for « Belton " read " Bitton." 

 „ 282, note 1, line 4, for « Berkeley" read « Russell." 

 " 283 ' llnes 3 and 4, for « Briggs " read « Bridges." 

 „ 288, line 14, /or " Rich" r«a^ » Roche." 

 „ 382, line 21, for "Nephew" read "Cousin." 

 ,, 388, line 26, for "42" read "47." 



