Index to N. P. Angelin's Palseontologia Scandinavica, with notes 



13 



Notes 



The name Cycloynathus, a synonyme of Acerocare and proposed by Linnaesson 1875, p. 500, ought to be 



dropped; compare Mobekg and Möller 1898, p. 230. 

 Compare Mobeeg and Möllee 1898, p. 231. 



Not identical with A. Barrandei Fletchee et Salter. Compare Lindström 1885, p. 53. 

 See Trapelocera bicnspis. 

 See Trapelocera? breviloba. 

 See A. granulata. 



As to the hypostoma compare Lindsteöm 1901, pl. 1, fig. 3. 

 See Cyrtomeiopus? decacanthus. 



According to Linnarsson (1869, p. 65) identical with A. centrina. 

 Compare Lindström 1885, p. 54. See also the following species. 

 According to Lindström 1885, p. 54, identical with A. Marklini. 



See Afieuacanthus. — In an abstract of Palseontologia Svecica in Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie etc 1852, 

 p. 242, was remarked that two genera Ei-yx and Aconthias previously existed among the serpents. 

 Surely for this reason Angelin in his ^Addenda et Corrigenda* amended Eryx to Elyx and 

 Aconthias to Aneucanthus (by Bareande 1856, p. 20, corrected to Aneuacanthus). 



See under Solenopleura. 



By misprint recorded from regio E instead of regio D. Compare Linnaesson 1869, p. 83, foot-note 2. 

 See Corynexochus ? umbonatus. 



By Angelin himself, p. IV, changed into Aneucanthus. See this. 

 Compare Tullberg 1880, p. 23. 



According to Tullberg 1880, p. 28, a mistake must have been made by Angelin in the reproduction of 

 the two species A. glandiformis and A. bituberculatus (plate VI, figs 1, 2): the head of Angelin's 

 fig. 1 and the tail of his fig. 2 belong to A. bituberculatus, the head of fig 2 and the tail of fig. 1 

 to A. glandiformis. — In the same paper Tullberg states that the specimen from Krekling in 

 Norway described by Beögger 1878, p. 75, under the name A. bituberculatus is not identical with 

 this species but with A. cfr lœvigatus Dalm. 



Compare Tullberg 1880, p. 35. 



Tullberg, who examined the specimens on which Angelin based this species, stated (1880, p. 22) that 

 the tail of the figured specimen is in reality the head of another species, described by Brögger 

 1878, p. 68, under the name A. Nathorsti. Only the head is known. — Compare also Wallerius 

 1895, p. 37, and Geönwall 1902, p. 53. 



Angelin records this species from regio D which probably ought to be C. Compare Töenquist 1884, 

 p. 90, and Wiman 1905, p. 12. 



