Indes to N. P. Angelin's Palaeontologia Scandinavica, with notes 



17 



Notes 



J To this genus Angelin also referred species belonging to Arionellus and Liostracus. Compare Baeeande 

 ' 1856, p. 20. 



iBy Baeeande 1856, p. 20, referred to the genus Arionellus Baee. See also the note to the following 

 species. 



By Baeeande, 1. c, referred to Arionelhis. — Linnaesson lt!73, p. 3, remarked that the tail by Angelin 

 referred to this species belongs to Liostracus niicrophthalmus. — On p. 22' Angelin ranged A. 

 aculeatus and A. acuminatus only as varieties of A. difformis (there called Proetus? difformis). 

 This earlier statement of Angelin was maintained by Bröggee 1878, p. 58, and Gkonwall 1902, 

 p. 161. LiNDSTEOM 1888, p. 4, however, mentioned the forms in question as three distinct 

 species. — Compare Beöggee, 1. c, and Geönwall, 1. c. 

 On page 22" Angelin writes Proetus? excavatus. Compare Geönwall 1902, p. 140. 

 » » 21" » s Proetus lœvis. » » » P- 141- 



» » 22" s » Proetus? limbatus. » » » 140. 



» * 22" » » Proetus? microphthalmus. By Linnaesson 1878, p. 244, referred to the genus 



Liostracus. See also the note to Anomocare difforme. 

 This genus has to be dropped; see the following note. 



According to Linnarsson 1880, p. 137 and 140, this species was based on the head of Sphcerophthalmus 

 alatus and the tail of Peltura scarabceoides. 



See Centropleura serrata and C. angusticauda. 



See the note to Agraulos. 



See Anomocare. 



This name was given to an isolated glabella of a Harpes, which had lost its margin, and consequently 



the name has to be dropped; compare Baeeande 1856, p. 23. 

 Belongs to the genus Harpes; see the preceding note. 



According to Schmidt 1901, p. 83, this form may be regarded as a variety of A. raniceps. 



According to the text the number 1 e of the plate must be misprinted for 3 e. — Compare Schmidt 

 1901, p. 24. See also A. fallax. — As to the hypostoma compare Beöggee 1886, pl. 1, fig. 2. 



According to Schmidt, 1. c, identical with A. expansus. See also the preceding note. 



See Niobe lata. Identical with this species is A. Trinucleorum Beöggee 1886, p. 35. Compare Olin 

 1906, p. 62. 



Lunds Univ:s Årsskrift. N. F. Afd. 2. Bd 6. 3 



