Index to N. P. Angelina Palpeontologia Scandinavica, with notes 



35 



Notes 



According to Schmidt 1904, p. 45, this species belongs to the genus Ptychopyge. He also preferred the 

 new name Pt. cincùt Brögger [1886), wich is a synonyme to this. 



jcompare Schmidt 1906, p. 49. 



See M. multiradiata, M. I'ltilimbata and M. rudis. See also the note to Illœnus centaurus. 

 ^Compare Schmidt 1906, p. 51. 



Probably identical with M. grandis SARS. Compare Holm 1883, p. 90, and Schmidt 1906, p. 56. 



Compare Schmidt 1906, p. 17, and, as to the hypostoma, Lindström 1901, pl. 5, fig. 7. 



According to Brögger 1882, p. 80, identical with M. grandis Sars. Compare also Schmidt 1906, p. 54. 

 Compare WiMAN 1905, p. 8, Moberg and Segerberg 1906, p. 97, Schmidt 1906, p. 10, and, as to the 

 hypostoma, Lindström 1901, pl. 5, flg. 8. 



According to Brögger 1882, p. 80, Töenquist 1884, p. 78, and Schmidt 1906, p. 56 and 60, a variety of 

 M. grandis Sars, but according to Wiman 1907: 2, p. 91, presamably a distinct species. 



(Compare Moberg 1902, Wiman 1904 and Schmidt 1904, p. 64. As to the hypostoma compare Brögger 

 1886, pl. 3, fig. 40, and Lindström 1901, pl. 5, fig. 13. 



By Wiman 1906, p. 291, ascribed to the genus Diaphanometopus F. Schmidt. 



iBy Angelin himself on p. 61 referred to the genus Symphysurus BuRM. Compare Brögger 1882, p. 61. 

 1 The hypostoma was described by Brögger 1886, p. 66. 



A synonyme is N. frontalis Kjerulf 1865. Compare Brögger 1882, p. 68. As for the hypostoma see 

 Brögger 1886, pl. 2, fig. 33. 



As to the hypostoma see Brögger 1886, pl. 2, flg. 85. 



|Not identical with N. frontalis Kjerulf 1865. As to the hypostoma see Brögger 1886, pl. 2, flg. 37. 

 According to Glin 1906, p. 62, identical with Asaphus ingens Barr. 



ICompare Schmidt 1900, p. 103. As to the hypostoma see Lindström 1901, pl. 5, fig. 23. 



