Index to N. P. Angelin's Palseontologia Scandinavica, with notes 



45 



Notes 



other authors wrote Seleuopleura, which name, as Lindström (1888: 1, p. 3, foot-note 1) has remarked, 

 Angelin never used. 

 Compare Gronwall 1902, p. 153. 

 » » ^ P- 



» » > p. 155. 



On this species Wallerius (1895, p. 52) has founded the new genus Acroceph alites. 



(According to ToRNQUiST 1884, p. 20, identical with Sph. mirus Beyr. Fig. 16a and 17 of pi. XXXVIII 

 1 don't belong to this species. 



According to Schmidt 1881, p. 161, identical with Chirums (Cyrtometopus) aries Eichw. 

 Belongs to the genus Pseudosphœrexochus F. Schmidt. Compare Schmidt 1881, p. 174, and Törnqüist 

 1884, p. 18. 



According to Schmidt 1881, p. 171, possibly belonging to Pseudosphœrexochus F. Schmidt. 

 According to Törnqüist 1884, p. 19, possibly identical with Fseudosphœrexochus conformis Ang. 



Compare Lindström 1885, p. 46. 



See Sph. angustifrons. See also the following note. 



According to ToRNQUiST 1884, p. 20, identical with Sph. mirus Beyr., but according to Lindström 1885, 



p. 45, distinguished from this species. 

 Belongs to Pseudosphœrexochus F. Schmidt. 



According to Schmidt 1881, p. 166, a subgenus of Chirurus Beyr. s. 1. 



According to Törnqüist 1884, p. 17, Chirurus (Cyrtometopus) pseudohemicranium Nieszk., described by 

 Schmidt 1881, p. 163, is identical with this species. See also Schmidt 1907, p. 10. 



By Angelin himself, pp. 65 and 66, changed into Sphcerocoryphe and S. dentata Ang. Se these. 



Angelin's figure is incorrect. Compare Linnarsson 1880, p. 7. See also the notes to Anopocare pusillum 

 and Olenus sphœiiopygm. 



Compare Linnarsson 1880, p. 12. 



By Linnarsson 1880, p. 22, referred to his genus Ctenopijge. 



Compare Clin 1906, p. 48. 



