359  Physiologia. 
38370  Ronbaud,  E.  11.68  :  57.72  Glossina 
1909.  Recherches  biologiques  sur  les  conditions  de  viviparité  et  de  vie 
larvaire  de  Glossina  palpalis  R.  Desv.  T.  R.  Acad.  Se.  Paris  T.  148  p.  19&- 
-197. 
71  Newman,  H.  H.  11.68  :  7.55  Fandulus 
1909.  The  Question  of  Viviparity  in  Fundulus  majalis.  Science  N.  S»^ 
Yol.  30  p.  769-771.  [Negative.] 
72  Korschelt,  E.  11.69 
1908*  Ueber  die  Beeinflussung  der  Komponenten  bei  Transplantation. 
Med.-nat,  Arch.  Bd.  1  p.  447—526.  [Tendenz  der  eingepflanzten  Stücke^ 
ihren  Charakter  zu  bewahren.] 
73  Driesch,  Hans.  11.69 
1909.  Der  Restitutionsreiz.  Rede  zur  Eröffnung  der  Sektion  für  Experi- 
mentelle Zoologie  des  7.  Internationalen  Zoologenkongresses  zu  Boston. 
Tortr.  Aufs.  Entw.  Mecli.  Org.  Heft  7,  24  pp. 
74  Goldfarb,  A.  J.  11.69 
1909.    The  Influence  of  the  Nervous  System  in  Regeneration.  Jonru. 
exper.  Zool.  Vol.  7  p.  643—722,  23  Agg.    [The  removal  of  the  nerve 
structures  has  no  visible  effect  upon  the  régénération.] 
39.3,  51.23,.6,  78,  79 
75  Stockard,  Charles  R.  11.69 
1909.  Studies  of  Tissue  Growth.  II.  Functional  Activity,  from  Reeulation, 
Level  of  the  Cut,  and  Degree  of  Injury  as  Factors  in  Determining  the 
Rate  of  Regeneration.  The  Reaction  of  Regenerating  Tissue  on  the  Old 
Body.   Journ.  exper.  Zool.  Vol.  6  p.  433—469,  1  pl.,  8  figg.      37.3.  39.4 
76  Zeleny,  Charles.  11.69 
1909.  Some  Experiments  on  the  Effect  of  Age  upon  the  Rate  of  Regene- 
ration. Journ.  exper.  Zool.  Vol.  7  p.  563 — 593.  [The  replacement  is  com- 
pleted  sooner  in  younger  animais.]  37.5,  39.4,  53.841,842.  79 
38377  Zeleny,  Charles.  11.69 
1909.  The  Effect  of  Successive  Removal  upon  the  Rate  of  Regeneration. 
Journ.  exper.  Zool.  Vol.  7  p.  477—512.  [Successive  removal  does  not 
cause  a  decrease  in  rate.]  37.5,  53.841, .842,  79 
78  Zeleny,  Charles.  11.69 
1909,  The  Relation  between  Degree  of  Injury  and  Rate  of  Regeneration. 
—  Additional  Observations  and  General  Discussion.  Journ.  exper.  Zool. 
Vol.  7  p.  513—561.  fincrease  of  the  rate  of  reg.  in  additional  injm-y  up 
to  an  optimum  degree.  beyond  which  further  injury  leads  to  a  decrease.] 
37.5,  39.4,  51.7,  53.841,.842,  78,  79 
79  Herlitzka,  Amedeo.  11.69 
1910.  Ein  Beitrag  zur  Physiologie  der  Regeneration.  Elektrophysio  lo- 
gische Untersuchungen.  Arch.  Entw.-Mech.  Bd.  30  p.  126—158.  [Das 
Potentialgefälle  zwischen  Zellinhalt  und  Aussenflüssigkeit  bei  Ver- 
letzung der  Zelle  bildet  den  Reiz  zur  Regeneration.]  9.9 
80  Morgulis,  Sergrius.  11.69 
1910.  Is  Regeneration  a  Répétition  of  the  Ontogenetic  and  Phylogenetic 
Processes.   Amer.  Natural.  Vol.  44  p.  92—107. 
81  Przibram,  H.  11.69 
1910.  Die  Verteilung  organbildender  Fähigkeiten  auf  Körperregionen. 
Verh.  zool.-bot.  Ges.  Wien  Bd.  60  p.  (111)-(116). 
82  Steinmann,  P.  11.69 
1910.  Regeneration  und  Sélection.  (Primitive  und  adaptive  Regeneration.) 
Verh.  Schweiz,  nat.  Ges.  93.  Vers.  Bd.  1  p.  294—295. 
88  Stockard,  Charles  R.  11.69 
1910.  Rates  of  Regeneration  in  Various  Salt  Solutions,  and  the  Influence 
of  Regenerating  Tissue  on  the  Animal  Body.  (Araer.  Soc.  Zool.)  Science 
N.  S.  Vol.  31  p.  469. 
38384  Wilson,  H.  V.  11.69  :  34.3  Microcionia 
1909.    A  Further  Contribution  on  the  Regenerative  Power  of  the  Somatic 
25.  II.  1911. 
