342 BULLETIN OF THE BUREAU OF FISHEEIES. 



MiGER, Felix, et Lanceet — Continued. 



1809. Memoires sur les larves d'insectes Coleopt^res aquatiques. 1. Memoire sur le grand 



Hydrophile. Annales, Museum nationale d'histoire naturelle, T. 14, pp. 441-459, PI. 28, 9 



figs. Paris. ; . 



Moore, Emmeline. 



1920. Some plants of importance in pondfish culture. Appendix IV, Report of the U. S. Commis- 

 sioner of Fisheries for 1919. Bureau of Fisheries Document No. 881, 20 pp., 1 mapi, 7 

 tables. Washington. 



MULSANT, E. 



1844. Historie naturelle des Coleopt^res de France. Vol. 3, Palpicomes, 196 pp., 1 pi. Paris et 

 Lyon. 



MuLSANT, E., et Cl. Rey, 



1861. Description d'une espece nouvelle d'Ochthebius [lejolissi] et de la larve de cet insects. 



Memoires, Societe Imperiale des Sciences Naturelles de Cherbourg, T. VIII, pp. 181-189, 

 Ipl. 



MuTTKOwsKi, Richard Anthony. 



1918. The fauna of Lake Mendota. A qualitative and quantitative survey with special reference 

 ' ■ to the insects. Transactions, Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts, and Letters, Vol. XIX, 



• Part I, pp. 374-482, 9 tables. Madison. 



Needham, James G. 



1904. Beetle drift on Lake Michigan. The Canadian Entomologist, Vol. XXXVI, pp. 294-296. 

 London, Canada. 



1907. Notes on aquatic insects of Walnut Lake, See Hankinson, 1907. 



1917. The insect drift of lake shores. The Canadian Entomologist, Vol. XLIX, pp. 129-137. 



London, Canada. 



1918. Aquatic insects. In Fresh-water biology, by Henry B. Ward and George C. Whipple, Ch. 



XXVII, pp. 876-946, Figs. 1354-1392. John Wiley & Sons (Inc.). New York and London. 

 Needham, James G., and J. T. Lloyd. 



1916. The life of inland waters. 8°, 438 pp., 244 text figs. Ithaca, N. Y. 

 Needham, James G., and Helen V. Williamson. 



1907. Observations on the natural history of diving beetles. The American Naturalist, Vol. XLI, 

 pp. 477-494, 8 figs. Boston. [A list of Dytiscidae found in the "Gym Pond" at Lake 

 Forest, with notes on their habits and life histories.] 

 Orchymont, a. d'. 



1913. Contribution k Fetude des larves hydrophilides. Annales de Biologic Lacustre, T. 6, pp. 



173-214, 23 figs. Bruxelles. [Described and figured the larvae of several European genera 

 and gave a classification of genera according to their known larvae.] 

 Paganetti-Hummler, G. 



1899. Coleopterologische Liebesszenen der Ochthebien. Zeitschrift fiir Entomologie, Dritte 

 Reihe, Bd. 4, p. 107. Breslau. 

 Pearse, a. S. 



1918. The food of the shore fishes of certain Wisconsin Lakes. Bulletin, U. S. Bureau of Fisheries, 

 Vol. XXXV, 1915-16 (1918), p^, 215-292. Bureau of Fisheries Document No. 856. 

 Washington. 

 Perris, Edouard. 



1876. Nouvelles promenades entomologiques. Annales, Societe Entomologique de France, S^rie 

 5, T. VI, pp. 171-244. Paris. [Heleophorus rugosus, t^^. IS^-l^h.] 

 Planet, Louis. 



1891. Developpement de T Hydrophile brun (Hydrophilus piceus). Hydrophilus piceus. Meta- 

 morphoses. Le Naturaliste, 2« S^rie, 13® Annee, pp. 259-260. Paris. 

 Plateau, Felix. 



1872. Un mot sur le mode d'adherence des males de Dytiscides aux femelles pendant Facte de I'ac- 

 couplement. Annales, Societe Entomologique de Belgique, T. 15, 1871-72, pp. 205-242. 

 Bruxelles. [Proved by experiment that a freshly killed Dytiscus marginalis, when its 

 suckers were applied to a glass cylinder, could support more than 13 times its own weight. 



1876. Note sur une secretion propre aux Col^opt^res Dytiscides. Ihid., T. 19, pp. 1-10. 



