Helianthemvm majus BSP. d, VII, 4. 

 Euphorbia glyptosperma Eng. e, V, 4. 

 Ceanothm ovatus Desf. a, III, 4. 

 (Enothera muricata L. e, V, 3. 

 Gerardia auriculata Michx. c, III, 2. 



Several forest species of flowering plants were also added to 

 the list. The following should be inserted in the Forest list in 

 the columns indicated by numbers: ^ 



Dactylis glomerata L. i, VII, 4. 



Eabenaria hracteata (Willd.) E. Br. a, I, 5. 



Fopulus halsamifera L. a, VI, 5. Evidently native. 



Geum strictun Ait. a, V, 4. 



Apios tuberosa Noench. c, VIII, 3. 



Sanicula gregaria Bick. a, I, 2. 



Galium palustre L. c, I, 3, 



Viburnum pubescens (Ait.) Pursh. b, III, 3. 



Many of the cryptogams were also favored by these seasons. 

 Mosses, especially those of the woods, were more abundant than 

 they had been in twenty years, and a very creditable list of 

 additional species was secured. Parasitic fungi were also un- 

 usually abundant, and a goodly number of species has been added 

 to the lists. Further collections of diatoms, lichens, etc., were 

 also made. A report upon these groups is in preparation. 



Observations on the sand-flora of the beaches were also con- 

 tinued, and the result is included in the accompanying report 

 on the sand-flora of the state. These beach-floras also felt the 

 effect of the greater supply of moisture, and the season of 1916 

 showed an increased number of low-ground species upon the 

 beaches. B. Shimek, 



Director of the Macbride Lakeside Laboratory, 1916. 



5 



