28 



DAVID AXDERSOX-BERRY, M.D., LL.D., ETC., OX 



with the four realities, but include " Scepticism as the third psycho- 

 logy, and '* Realism "as the fourth ? 



4. On p. 15 I read, Phenomena imply substance." Is this 

 not confined to Physical Phenomena ? What, for instance, is the 

 substance in pain, love, hate, etc., as shown on p. 22 ? 



5. On p. 20 we read : The functions and j^owers of the body may 

 be di\'ided into two classes,, the vegetative and the organic." 



But surely, the vegetative are organic ? Why is the usual di\'ision 

 into vegetative as anabolic and animal as katabolic ignored ? 

 and in your second division' " organic," is not the energizing 

 principle life " rather than motion " ? 



6. We read on p. 20 as approved that mental operations are 

 only possible through the brain " ; but are not happiness, fellow- 

 ship, etc., mental operations ? and is it not shown (p. 25) that these 

 are possible without the brain ? 



I trust I have not been too inquisitive, and cordially thank Dr. 

 Anderson-Berry for his interesting paper. 



Rev. J. J. B. Coles said that there were one or two points in the 

 excellent paper just read in which he did not quite agree with the 

 learned lecturer. On p. 16 he says " there are thus four great realities 

 in the Universe — Matter, Spirit, Space and Time, consequently there 

 are four psychologies possible — four, no more, no less." Were there 

 not five ? 



Would not in the Solar System," or in this part of the Universe, 

 be better than in the Universe as a whole ? 



Euclid's geometry, according to Professor Einstein's doctrine of 

 Relati^'ity, may be true and applicable within the limits of the 

 Solar System, but not necessarily so throughout the vast Universe. 

 " He that descended is the same that ascended far above all heavens 

 that He might fill all things." 



Christ, Who is the Image of the In\dsible God, the Firstborn of 

 all creation, cannot properly be included in Dr. Anderson-Berry's 

 Four Great Realities. 



It is true He is spirit, but He is more than spirit. The union of 

 the human and Di\'ine in the glorious Person of the Risen God-Man 

 is, as we knovv, transcendently wonderful and inscrutable. Still, 

 Avith all reverence w% see that to contemplate adoringly the 

 psychology of the Blessed Lord, as set forth in Holy Scripture, 



