at the Gloucester Meeting^ 1853. 363 



Oil-Cake Crushers ron Thin Cake, 



<StHnd. 







Quantity 

 Crushed. 



93 Revolu- 

 tions ecjuftl 

 3 Minutes. 



Compara- 

 tive Power. 



Wei-ht 

 on Lever. 











lbs. 







lbs. 



£. $. 0. . 



91 



4 





16 



93 



29-06 



5 



5 3 (t 



91 



1 



Ditto 



213- 



93 



29 93 





3 0 0 





18 







93 



22-54 



12 



4 4 0 



1 



17 





27 



93 



37 88 



11 



7 10 0 





31 





60i 



93 



19-98 



13 



6 16 ti 



We awarded the prize to Mr. Nicholson of Newark. 

 The reasonable price of his machine, places it within the reach 

 of all, and it did its work well and easily by the power of one man. 



Turnip Cutters. 



Stand. 



Art. 



Name. 



Revolu- 

 tions on 

 Break. 



Weight 



on 

 Break. 



Quantity 

 of Roots 

 Cut. 



Compara- 

 tive Tower 

 to do the 

 Work. 





Trice. 



68 



14 

 51 

 109 



20 

 76 



2 

 1 

 9 

 8 



34 

 41 



Samuelson . . . 

 Kealey .... 

 Carson .... 

 Marychurch . . . 

 Uansome and Co. . 

 Fowler and Fry 



22 



{%\ 

 IS} 



S 24 

 i 50 



13 

 16 

 13 

 11 

 9 



10 } 



28 

 28 

 28 

 28 

 28 

 28 



f 234 

 1 273 

 t 384 

 I 336 



286 1 



C 286 

 \ 143 

 [ 324 

 1 243 

 f 408 

 1 bQd 



Bullock X 

 Sheep 3 

 Sheep 7 

 Bullock ] 

 Sheep or^ 

 Bullock S 

 Sheep ") 

 Bullock 5 

 Sheep \ 

 Bullock ) 

 Fine "X 

 Coarse ] 



£. s. <L 

 5 10 0 



5 10 0 



4 4 0 



4 0 0 



4 5 G 



7 10 0 



The machine of Mr. Samuelson of Banbury, being both simple 

 and efficient, we awarded it the prize. 



We also highly commend the " Moody turnip cutter," ex- 

 hibited by Mr. Carson of Warminster. 



This machine not only cuts the turnips exceedingly well, but 

 also cleans them during the operation ; but whether the gouge- 

 shaped" knives, as placed, will stand the work when the turnips 

 are frozen, requires time for proof. 



Drain-Tile Machines. 



Stand. 



Art. 



Name. 



Length 

 of each 

 Pipe. 



Total 

 Length 

 of Pipes 



in 

 Inches. 



Dia- 

 meter 



of 

 Pipes. 



Number 

 of Pipes 

 made. 



Time 

 in 



Minutes. 



Compa- 

 rative 

 Power 



for each 



Hundred 

 Inches 



of Pipe. 



Number 

 of 



Eevolu- 

 tions of 

 Testing 

 Machine. 



Weight 



of' 

 Lever. 



Price. 



S* 

 42t 



1 

 1 



Armitage 

 Scragg . 



13 

 13i 



2133 



2 



i58 



5 



i29 



1''2 



lbs. 

 25 



16 0 



15t 

 9T§ 



1 

 9 



Whitehead 

 Williams 



13* 



134- 



22&2 

 1282 



2 

 2 



175 



95 



3 

 5 



116 

 142 



125 

 114 



21 

 16 



21 0 

 17 0 



* Screened so badly, which caused broken pipes to such an extent that w e do not record the 

 experiment. 



+ Tlie number of pipes produced, 158, including 29 bad ones. Box ISi wide, 8i deep, 

 i The qnalitv of pipes very superior. The number produced vas 175, including 5 onlv useless. 

 Box l.f X 9 in." ^ ^ ^ o . 



§ The number of pipes produced was 95, including 8 useless. Box ICi X -'J- 



