, ' i^i 



laruiTij parciumque & porcionism , vel infefibilium penicos& 

 vel a Subcilioribas vix percepdbiliom» ad lerfsus omniuni 

 crairifTimi exaiiaenreTOcares & qqashic nonOatimdeprehen. 

 dic effi-caci^s differencias, eas pri^propere mgzm veile » ac 11 

 quis duarum morieearum aurearum e|usdem magnicudinis 

 diverfiquegeneris, akerius fc, ex auro rheoano^ akedus 

 Hungarico, pondus examinacurus ad lapien^p cujqsdam lan? 

 ces rem deferreCs impofirisque hac uaii iila kncialterij nu!-' 

 la leafibili alccrucrius depreffione oocaca> ftatim inferrec, nul- 

 hm ^fgo efle ia duabus iliis monecis dilFerenciam ponderis^ 

 auc praepooderandi efficacrara in uno rd akero aud gencrc, 

 ve! ad exemplar illacionis Auchoris noftri fic coq.cloderec2 

 diver/a aun generdi ejjent aBiv^. medmnte gmvitate fua in 

 lihrdt cujusdam Unces^ nofp pojjet exfticariiquomodo in Uhra 

 It^ufus Imti ex itnfojitione duarum monetarum magmtudine- 

 nt^mliMm^ fed e diverJiS auri generibus cujarumi idem tame&^ 

 fondm perciperetur, Cujus equid^m coefeqpeaci^^ nullicacem 

 quin effencvifuri Qmnesaurificum nemulariorum pueri,ae* 

 mo dubicabiCiadfuas fc. fubcilioris multofabric^ bilancesne« 

 gocium hoc ftacim revocaturi , iaibique difcrimen ponderis 

 in utroque auri generead oculum demonftraouri. Eadem 

 omnino racio eft argumentiprimi Auchoris noftri ha£lenu§ 

 fub incudem vocati,prouc fub inicium hujus epiftol^oftea- 

 fum; uc cramben biscoftam hic apponere non fruftraneun^ 

 folum/ftd iagratum etiam effec futurum, Quamqbrem ad 

 fecundum ejus argumentum» quodp. 35. (edit.no v*p. 71 •) 

 proponitj progrediendum nobis effec, quo arguic, concefk 

 aiiivitate Jigurii^ non pojje explicari quomodo medio motu» quem 

 emfmt in cute , fenfits comrhunis pojjt determinari ^d diftin^ 

 guendum chj.ecium t(%£ii4myV*g*,c(ilorem reperiri in t^li^tUjQn-^ 

 foriii id vero explicari & polFe & dcbere icerum cacice fup«. 

 ponens concludic: Ergo figurs non habent cm[are fenfationem 

 fn cute medio mom ^c, Scd faoG etiam (egiiadum argumen- 



