BIBLIOGRAPHY 



I AM indebted to the following works for information on the subjects dealt with in this volume : — 

 AuRiviLLius, Chr. Rhopalocera Aethiopica. Stockholm, 1898. 



Bates, H. VV. Contributions to an Insect Fauna of the Amazon Valley. Trans. Linn. Soc, xxiii, 1862. 

 Blakiston, T., and Alexander, T. Protection by Mimicry. A Problem in Mathematical Zoology. Nature, 



vol. xxix, pp. 405-6, 1884. 

 Belt, T. The Naturalist in Nicaragua. London, 1888. 



Butler, A. G. Remarks upon some Caterpillars, &c., which are Unpalatable to their Enemies. Trans. Ent. 

 Soc, 1869, p. 27, &c. 



Cistula Entomologica. London, 1869-82. 



Darwin, C. Origin of Species. London, 1859. 



Distant, W. L. Rhopalocera Malayana. London, 1882-6. 



Dixey, F. a. On the Relation of Mimetic Patterns to the Original Form. Trans. Ent. Soc, p. 65, &c., 1896. 

 Mimetic Attraction. Trans. Ent. Soc, p. 317, 1897. 



Dixey, F. A., and G. B. Longstaff. Entomological Observations and Captures during the Visit of the British 

 Association to South Africa in 1905. Trans. Ent. Soc, p. 309, &c., 1907. 



Dixey, F. A. On Miillerian Mimicry and Diaposematism. Trans. Ent. Soc, p. 559, 1908. 



Druce, H. H. Descriptions of some new Butterflies from Tropical Africa. Trans. Ent. Soc, p. 83, &c., 1907. 



Finn, F. Contributions to the Theory of Warning Colours and Mimicry. Joum. As. Soc. Bengal. Calcutta, 

 1895-7- 



Haase, E. Untersuchungen iiber die Mimicry. Bib. ZooL, vol. iii. Stuttgart, 1892. 

 Hewitson, W. C. Exotic Butterflies. London, 1855-74. 



Hopkins, F. G. The Pigments of the Pieridae. Roy. Soc. Trans., London, vol. clxxxvi, p. 661, &c. 



The Pigments of the Pieridae. Proc. Roy. Soc, Ivii, 1894. 



KiRBY, W., AND Spence, W. An Introduction to Entomology. London, 1822-6. 



Leigh, G. F., Poulton, and Trimen. S5mepigonic Series of Papilio cenea (1902-3), and Hypolimnas misippus 



(1904). Trans. Ent. Soc, p. 677, &c., 1904. 

 Lock, R. H-. Variation, Heredity, and Evolution. London, 1906. 

 Longstaff, G. B. Bionomic Notes on Butterflies. Trans. Ent. Soc, p. 607, 1908. 

 Morgan, Lloyd. Habit and Instinct. London, 1896. 



Marshall, G. F. L., and De Niceville, L. Butterflies of India. Calcutta, 1882-90. 



Marshall, G. A. K. Notes on Seasonal Dimorphism in South African Rhopalocera. Trans. Ent. Soc, p. 551, 

 1896. 



(with Poulton and others). Five Years' Observations and Experiments on the Bionomics of South African 



Insects. Trans. Ent. Soc, p. 287, &c., 1902. 

 On Diaposematism with reference to some Limitations of the Miillerian Hypothesis of Mimicry. Trans. 



Ent. Soc, p. 93, &c., 1907. 



Birds as a Factor in the Production of Mimetic Resemblance among Butterflies. Trans. Ent. Soc, p. 329, 



&c., 1909. 



Mayer, A. G. On the Colour and Colour-Patterns of Moths and Butterflies. Bulletin of the Museum of 



Comparative Zoology, Harvard, vol. xxx, No. 4, 1897. 

 Meldola, R. Translation of Miiller's Paper on Ituna and Thyridia. Proc. Ent. Soc, p. xx, 1879. 



Mimicry between Butterflies of Protected Genera. Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 5, vol. x, p. 417, 1882. 



Muller, F. Ein merkwiirdiges Beispiel von Mimicry bei Schmetterlingen. Kosmos, Bd. v, p. 100, &c., 1879. 

 Neave, S. a. On a large Collection of Rhopalocera from the Shores of the Victoria Nyanza. Novit. ZooL, xi, 



1904. 



Some Bionomic Notes on Butterflies from the Victoria Nyanza. Trans. Ent. Soc, p. 207, &c, 1906. 



