124 INDIANA UNR^RSITY STUDIES 



TABLE No. 1— Profile of the West Fork of White River.' 



Stations. 



Dis- 

 tance 

 Apart. 



Distance 

 from 



Nobles- 

 ville. 



Elevation. 



Feet of 

 Fall bet- 

 ween Sta- 

 tions. 



Fall per mile be- 

 tween Stations 

 in Feet. 



Noblesville 



0 





0 



741 



0 



0.0 



Indianapolis 



34 





34 



675 



66 



1.9 



Martinsville 



43 





77 



600 



75 



1.7 



Spencer 



38 





115 



540 



60 



1.6 





32 





147 





o~t 



1 OR 



Newberry 



38 





185 



476 



30 



0.8 



Edwardsport 



29 





214 



445 



31 



1.0 



Washington 



25 





239 



419 



26 



1.0 



Junction 



17 





256 



400 



19 



1.10 



Mouth 



50 





306 



376 



24 



0.45 



Profile of East Fork. 





Dis- 





Distance 





Fall 



Fall per Mile 



Stations. 



tance 



from Mor- 



Elevation. 



Between 



Between 





Apart. 





ristown. 





Stations. 



Stations. 



Morristown 



0 





0 



741 



0 



0.0 



Edinburg 



50 





50 



625 



116 



2.3 



Columbus 



21 





71 



602 



23 



1.1 



Rockford 



25 





96 



556 



46 



1.8 



Medora 



30 





126 



505 



51 



1.7 



Riverdale 



40 





166 



479 



26 



0.65 



Shoals 



50 





216 



450 



29 



0.58 



Junction 



58 





274 



400 



50 



0.86 



Mouth 



50 





324 



376 



24 



0.45 



1 W. M. Tucker, Indiana Department of Geology and Natural Resources, 1910. The last two columns 

 were added by the writers. 



A study of the two profile tables shows a noticeably high fall at 

 the source of the two streams, which rapidly decreases until Columbus 

 is reached on the East Fork, and Noblesville on the West Fork. 

 (Diagram No. 1 shows this very well.) The fall above Noblesville 

 is between three and four feet to the mile. On the East Fork 



