at the Lewes Meeting, 1852. 



325 



direct from the thrashing machines, w ith a large admixture of long straws and 

 all the chavings, are still unrivalled, and it is scarcely excelled as a finishing 

 machine. 



Linseed and Coen Crushers. 



















13 















Crush 

 bs. of 

 d. 



itive 

 jquire 



Crush 

 bs. of 



equire 



y of Wor 

 presentii 

 Work. 











Name. 



_c 



t~ « 











Price. 











m 





li 



0) 













c 







s 



s ^ 





s 





i o 









m 



< 











H 

















m. 







m. 



S. 







£. s. 





9 



1 



Stanley .... 



3 



25 



2438 



3 



10 



2744 



18 



12 0 



0 



22 



11 



Kichmond 



4 



27 



5382 



4 



41 



3625 



16 



6 10 



0 



79 



11 



Woods .... 



4 



4 



4662 



2 



9 



2622 



19 



12 0 



0 



72 



19 



Barrett and Co. . 



3 



18 



4182 



2 



42 



2856 



16 



8 2 



0 



54 



26 



Garrett .... 



4 



30 



4031 



1 



24 



1656 



18 



11 0 



0 



65 



14 



Carson .... 



4 



30 



3197 



1 



48 



1705 



13 



6 0 



0 



62 



4 



Turner .... 



6 



0 



4255 



1 



55 



1770 



14 



9 9 



0 



21 



16 



White .... 



3 



50 



3332 



1 



37 



1400 



13 



7 7 



0 



This prize was awarded to Messrs. Stanley. Their nearest competitors 

 had machines on their principle. For linseed, for which they are best 

 adapted, it was superior to all in regularity of feed and lightness of draught, 

 and to most of them in quality of work. It has a new and clever arrangement 

 for regulating and adjusting the feed. 



Hand Chaff-Machines. 



124 turns of Testing Machine were allowed to each Chaff-Machine— equal to 4 m. 



of Time. 



stand. 



Article. 



Name. 



Weight of Chaff- 

 Cut. 



Weiifht Cut per 

 Hour. 



Weight on 

 Lever. 



Power required 

 to Cut 1 lb. of 

 Chaff. 



Price. 









lbs. 



lbs. 



lbs. 





£. 



s. 



d. 



16 



2 



Allcock .... 



7 



105 



15 



2,14 



7 



0 



0 



54 



29 



Garrett .... 





86f 



12 



2,08 



6 



6 



0 



41 



1 



Bennett .... 



9 



135 



14 



1,55 



5 



0 



0 



73 



60 



Ran some .... 



15 



225 



25 



1,66 



6 



0 



0 



22 



5 



Richmond 



12 



180 



14 



1,16 



9 



0 



0 



48 



6 



James Cornes . 



13 



195 



17 



1,30 



4 



15 



0 



44 



33 



William Dray . 



141 



217i 



17 



1,17 



12 



0 



0 



55 



9 



Smith, Stamford. . 



16 



240 



24 



1,50 



9 



0 



0 



57 



12 



Smith, Uxbridge 



84 



mh 



15 



1,76 



4 



10 



0 



65 



8 



Carson .... 



4f 



7lf 



11 



2,31 



4 



0 



0 



This prize was awarded to Mr. James Cornes. It will be seen above that 

 he was in several cases exceeded in quantity, but it was generally at the 

 expense of quality. That, taken into account with the easy draught and low 

 price of his machine, entitled it, in the opinion of the judges, to the prize. 



