in A/jricultaral Chemistry. 



Alt) 



D 1.— MISCELLANEOUS CROPS, 



ACM PORTION PER CENT. 



Jombustible Matter. 



ilements. 



Azotised. 



Unazotisecl. 



3 OJ 0, 



Inorganic Matter or A.sli. 



Authority. 



Sorhy 1 



Sorl>y 



■op m. -^ri 



2-3 4-6 ;'/4 ? 



Spreiigel 

 Fromberg 



Sorhy 1 

 0*448 



•6 26-8 

 •7 11-7 



Chi. 1 

 7*5 I «'3 H-2' ?. 



' ! i 



2--121'5! ? 



Chi. 



I _ 



Sprengel 



Furlong & 

 M'Calmont 



Waldie . 



Johnston 

 Johnston 



Liebig . 

 Vauquelin 



i;-2 3r2 



5-GjI8*3 



G-0 2G- 



i 



.•riin-.s 



11-8 !<J-3 



Chi. 



Chi. 

 3*8 



135-G 

 il7-3 



l-I - 



? _ 



12-2 

 2-6 



2-i)|ll-4|i7-6 



9*6i 6'5! 6'C 

 10-lj 5-8jl5-l 

 I 



Wl 2-2I ? 

 - I l-92r3-5 



Liebig 

 Liebig 



Way 3 

 3*00 



iro 



8-3 9-6 



0-3 3G-G 

 2-1 '34-8 



1-5 



AVith 

 fibre 



2G-2 

 7-1 



Way . . 



Nesbit . 

 Cameron Sc 

 M'Calmont 



I Nesbit . 

 Nesbit . 



0-388 

 Sorby 1 

 0-12 



Sorby 1 

 0*091 



22-9 21*5 

 11'] 16*4 



5*lil5'8 

 15*3 8*8 



19*0 

 n*9 

 1*223*5 

 1*2 3G* 9 





21-4 



7*0 



5*4 



5*1 



10-9 



4*7 



? 



5*3 



14*7 



la'2 





7-5 

 6*3 



7*8 

 3-7 



2*0 

 3*9 



2-*S 

 18*9 



6-7 



5-1 



3*li 



20-5 



10*9 44* 

 10*8 55* 



Kane . . 

 Hodges . 

 'J'liomson 

 Liebig . 



Way . . 



Liebig . 



21*4 9*8 



ir.'j 



34*8 IG-S 

 0*9 25*9 



i 



1*4 34*2 

 14*021 



9*8 12*3 



_ 4:;*G 



0*7 26*0 

 1*7 8*4 



Chi. 

 2*4 



- 1 trace 

 trace 

 1*6 



_ 0*4 



10-S 2*7 



25*2 2'v 

 40*1' i-0 



38*5: 1*6 



0-09 35-o: 0-b 



Liebig , 10 



? 17-4 2*3j41-5|12*2 _ 4*4 



Norton omitted to give tlieir relative proportions. /». Leaves. Professor .Tolmston found tlie nsh to vary from 7 to 20 



analysis is evidently of little value, and was only inserted lor want of a better at the time. Sulphur was used in the 



asii is quoted, in a prize essay of tlie Royal A^'rieultnral Journal of Ihiirland, as bein^ that of the residue of llax steep- 

 althou:,'h th.ere is evidently a mistake in the quantity of potasli stated tiiore. //. The amount of silica was probably not 



