890 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY. 



Table D—coiitimied. 



Spillman's 

 Table No. 





Plat Xo. 



" Long " 



" Intermediate " 



" Short " 



XI . . h 



16 



S 



112 

 116 

 117 



1 , IIS 



341 

 34 0 

 24-8 

 195 

 306 

 28-G 

 232 



570 

 47-1 

 58-8 

 513 

 50-0 

 54-4 

 67-1 



10-3 



18- 2 

 15-6 

 29-3 



19- 4 

 1G-9 



9-8 



XII . . < 



A 

 U 



G4 



Go 



G13 



G14 



G16 



G18 



H2 



H6 



H7 



H8 



H9 



H10 



Hll 



H12 



H14 



HI 5 



H16 



H17 



G20 



34-2 



26- 4 

 25-5 

 40-0 

 291 



23- 2 



24- 8 

 231 

 23-7 

 33-6 

 254 



21- 4 



22- 2 



23- 6 



27- 8 

 30-5 

 223 



- 25-1 

 33-6 



430 

 42-3 



51- 0 

 36-6 

 48-4 



56- 4 

 68-8 

 504 



52- 9 

 52-0 

 44-9 

 504 



57- 7 

 48-4 

 33-9 

 410 

 520 

 251 



58- 8 



230 

 12-2 

 21-4 

 23*3 

 18-9 

 20-2 

 6-4 

 241 

 20-5 

 14-4 

 28-6 

 28-1 

 201 

 26-4 

 37-9 

 28 0 

 34-7 

 45-4 

 11-4 



XIII . . ^ 



/ J6 

 J 7 

 119 

 J3 

 J4 

 J8 

 J9 

 J10 

 J12 

 J13 



\ J14 



24-5 

 30-4 

 263 

 22-8 

 24-G 

 251 

 18-7 

 174 

 20-8 

 273 

 27-7 



51-2 

 50-8 

 60-1 

 41-8 

 53 2 

 503 

 44-4 

 53-7 

 57-4 

 36-7 

 421 



24-4 

 18-5 

 135 



35- 1 

 221 



27- 2 



36- 1 



28- 7 

 20-8 

 35-G 



29- 9 



1 



XIV 





D2 



D8 



D9 



D10 



Dll 



D15 



DIG 



279 

 230 

 23-6 

 33G 

 24 7 

 2G-9 

 14-8 



46-4 

 38-0 



60- 8 

 511 



61- 1 

 41-8 

 48-7 



25-7 

 28-8 

 15-8 

 15-3 

 14-3 

 81-9 

 35-5 



Total . 





95 



2519-9 



4585-4 



23304 



Average 







. 26 5 



48-2 



24-5 



Mendelian ratio . 





. 25 



50 : 



25 





types, viz. "long," "intermediate," and "short," i.e. the two original 

 forms and intermediate forms, the last being twice as numerous as either 

 of the others. Table D gives the approximate percentages of each type 

 found in each plat, and it will be seen that with a few exceptions the 

 figures fairly agree with the Mendelian expectation of A + 2Aa + a, i.e. 25 % 



