9 



Artemisia mariiima, L., var. gallica, Willd. Near Sandwich, 

 Oct. loth, 1887.— F. H. Ward. 



Senecio vulgaris, L., var. radiatus, Koch. L'Ree, Guernsey, 

 July 2nd, 1887. — M. Dawber. 



Arctiuin . Roundstone, Galway, August iith, 1885. — 



W. R. Linton. Too poor to name with any certainty. — A. 

 Bennett. 



Arctium — . Ramsey, Hunts., Sept., 1885. — W. R. 



Linton. A. ma/us. — A. Bennett. 



Arctium intermedium, Lange. Buckden, Hunts., Sept., 1885. 

 A. majus and ininus grow intermixed along the bank whence 

 these specimens were gathered. All these specimens except 

 the three lowest are from one plant whose habit was distinct 

 from ordinary minus. Mr. Beeby saw specimens from this plant 

 and considered they might come under intermedium. — W. R. 

 Linton. 



Carduus acanthoidesy L. Southoe, Hunts., September, 1886. 

 — W. R. Linton. Mr. Bennett states that on comparing C. 

 acanihoides, L. with C. litigiosus^ he finds that they are essentially 

 the same plant ; but that the specimens from Southoe, Hunts., 

 are not acanthoides^ but crispus. — E. F. L. 



Centaurea nigra, L., var. decipiens, Thuill. Cliffs near Swanage, 

 Sept. 29th, 1887. — F. H. Ward. May pass I suppose for the 

 variety. A specimen sent by Mr. R. Paulson as Centaurea Jacea 

 is nothing but C. nigra. — A. Bennett. 



Hieracium Pilosella, L., var. Peleterianum, Mer. South Cliffs, 

 Guernsey, June 13th, 1887. — M. Dawber. 



H. ccBsium, Fr. Winch Bridge, Teesdale, Durham, June 

 26th, 1887.— H. T. Mennell. 



H. vulgatum, Fr,, var. 7?iaculatum. Bank of Nith, Sanquhar, 

 August, 1887.— A. Davidson. 



//. vulgatum, Fr. } Crawich, Sanquhar ; late flowering, 

 August and September, 1887. This is apparently vulgatum in 

 everything save the styles and time of flowering. — ^^A. Davidson. 

 Nothing but H. vulgatum ; I have found it, near Rugby, with 

 yellow styles, though this is not usual ; and the late flowering is 

 evidently due to the main stem having been nibbled down.— 

 E. F. Linton. 



H. gothicum, Fr. Winch Bridge, Teesdale, Aug., 1886. — H. 

 T. Mennell. Correct, I believe.— A. Bennett. In the remain- 

 ing sheet, which I kept, are two specimens under the above 

 label; one \s gothicum, though being a secondary stem, it does 

 not at first sight look much like gothicum. The other plant is 

 probably rigidum, but is a poor specimen, and not typical.^ 

 E. F. Linton. 



