II 



Oroba?iche HedercB, Duby. iMoulin Huet, Guernsey, July i 2th, 

 1887. — M. Dawber. O. initio?' only, I consider. — A. Bennett. 



O. amethystea, Thuill. Sea-cliffs, Downderry, Cornwall, June 

 17th, 1887. On Daucus, — J. Vaughan. I believe correct ; this 

 is easily recognisable when growing, but all OrobanchcB are 

 difficult when dried. — A. Bennett. 



Scutellaria galericulaia X ininor. Virginia Water, Surrey, 

 August, 1883. — Leg. G.Nicholson; comm. Arth. Bennett. 



Mentha viridis, L. Gwythian, West Cornwall, Sept., 1886. 

 — Coll. Wm. Curnow; comm. A. Stewart. Looks correct, 

 but seems a starved specimen, or a side shoot only. — A. Bennett. 



3f. rubra, Sm. Shirlev, Derbyshire, August 29th, 1887. — 

 W. R. Linton. "Yes, but not' typical."~Mr. J. G. Baker 

 through A. Bennett. 



M, Numviularia, Schreb, Cornfield, Sanquhar, Dumfries, 

 Sept., 1887. — A. Davidson. This is not good Nummularia, 

 too hairy ; but still it recedes from the type towards that variety. 

 — A. Bennett. 



Stachys palustris X sylvatica. Dewsbury, S.W. Yorks, 1887. — 

 P. F. Lee. Calyx and leaf-petioles certainly put it under the 

 hybrid, but the whole habit of the plant is much more palustris 

 than sylvatica, and is very different to the Orkney ambigua of 

 Dr. Boswell. — A. Bennett. 



Atriplex viarina L. L'Ree, Guernsey, July 3rd, 1887. — M. 

 Dawber. Yes. — A. Bennett. 



A. deltoidea, Bab. Cobo, Guernsey, July 31st, 1887. — M. 

 Dawber. Is A. Babingtonii, Woods. — A. Bennett. Hort., 

 Bangor, August, 1887. — J. E. Griffith. This is not the plant 

 of Babington. I think it is erecta, but the fruit is immature, and 

 the central stem cut off, so it is dubious. — A. Bennett. The 

 remaining specimens which Mr. Griffith has sent will not do for 

 a patula form. They would come under hastata or deltoidea. 

 Can Mr. Bennett's specimen have been mixed in by mistake 7 

 —E. F. Linton. 



A. deltoidea, Bab.. Willesden, Middlesex, Sept., 1886.— W. 

 R. Linton. Excellent deltoidea. — A. Bennett. 



Polygoftum aviculare^ L., var. Malvern Link, Worcester, August 

 12, 1887. I think this must be rurivagum, Jord. R. F. 

 TowNDROw. How it it possible to name such a specimen ? 

 there is not a single flower or fruit on it : such are perfectly 

 useless. — A. Bennett. 



Ditto, Corn-field, Fyfield, Essex, August, 18S7.— R. Paulson. 

 Almost as bad as the preceding, but I think a form of the var. 

 vulgatum. — A. Bennett. 



