2 



Ranunculus Jluiiafis, Lam., form. Brailsford, S. Derbyshire, 

 Sept., 1888. — W. R. Linton. R. penicillatus, Hiern. — 

 A. Bennett. 



R. Drouetii, Godr., var. Godronii, Gren. Totternhoe, Bedford, 

 May 25th, 1888.— Miss D. M. Higgins. May be correct but 

 the material to decide a plant in such a critical genus is in- 

 sufficient. — A. Bennett. 



Cochlearia anglica, L., var. Horlii, Syme. Bromborough, 

 Cheshire, August 26th, 1888. — A. E. Lomax. Correct, I believe; 

 it matches specimens so marked by Dr. Syme. — A. Bennett. 



Sisymbrium pannonicum, Jacq. Waste ground, Redland, 

 Bristol, June, 1888. — H. S. Thompson. Certainly not ^9. pan- 

 nojiicum^ much nearer S. Columella, but I think 6^. Loeselii.— 

 A. Bennett. 



Viola permixta, Jord. Park Road, Luton, Bedfordshire, May, 

 1888.— Miss D. M. Higgins. V. sylvatica f.— A. Bennett. 



V, hij'ia, L., var. calcarea, Bab. Barton Hills, Bedford, April 

 26th, 1886. — Miss D. M. Higgins. Probably correct by the 

 small flowers and spur, but specimens gathered in fruit are 

 desirable for positive certainty with this plant. — A. Bennett. 



Lepigo?iu?n salinian, Fr., var. 7ieglecium, Kindb. In palude 

 salino, Bromborough, Cheshire, Anglia, August 28th, 1887. — 

 Legit A. E. Lomax. Seeds papillose, seems correct. — 

 A. Bennett. 



Ruhus fissusy Lindl. Shirley, S. Derbyshire, July, 1887. — 

 W. R. Linton. Yes. — C. C. Babington. 



7?. nitidus, W. and N., var. hamulosus, P. J. Miill. Wood, 

 near Bidston, Cheshire, Sept., 1887. — A. E. Lomax. I think 

 the R. hamulosus is distinct from nitidus, — C. C. Babington. 



R. hemistemon, P. J. Miill. prope Simmonswood, Lancashire, 

 Sept., 1887. — A. E. Lomax. Yes.— C. C. Babington. 



R. pyramidalis, Kalt., fide Focke. Thorpe, Norfolk, E., Sept., 

 1888. — E. F. Linton. This is a glabrous state of pyramidalis, 

 Kalt. It \s the heleroclilus of Bloxam's "set," 1876: the true 

 heteroclitus is one of the suherecii. — C. C. Babington. 



R. ihomhifolius, Weihe. Nayland, Suffolk, Aug., 1888. — J. D, 

 Gray. I do not think rhomhifolius but pyramidalis, Kalt., probably. 



