4 



R. flexuosus, M. and L. Near High Beech, Epping Forest, 

 Aug., 1888. — R. Paulson. The large prickles seem to show that 

 this is not flexuosus nor pallidus (the true plant). I think it is 

 foliosus, as understood by me in my notes (No. 43). — C. C. 

 Babington. 



R. Bellardi, Weihe. Biddulph, Staffs., Oct., 1888.— W. H. 

 Painter, erythradenes Miill. It resembles pendulinus in many 

 respects. — C. C. Babington. 



R. hirtus^ W. and N. Copse by Household Heath, Norfolk, 

 Aug., 1888. — E. F. Linton. I think that this is pendulinus, 

 Miill, which Mr. Gray has sent from Polstead, Suffolk.— C. C. 

 Babington. 



R. ccBsius, L., var. intermedi'us, Bab. Beelby, Norfolk, Oct., 

 1888. — E. F. Linton. I have placed specimens like this to 

 ccBsius-infermedius perhaps erroneously, but I have not yet worked 

 the difficult plants out. — C. C. Babington. 



R. ccBsius, L., var. intermedius, Bab. Harling to Larling, Nor- 

 folk, Oct., 1888. — E. F. Linton. This seems more like ulmi- 

 foHus, that is Hgerinus, but I remark as on the last. — C. C. 

 Babington. 



Rosa rubiginosa, L., var. inodora. Roadside near Croston, 

 Lancashire, June, 1888. — F. C. King. Is, I think, a iomeniosa 

 form, not inodora, or rubiginosa. — J. G. Baker. 



R. senticosa, Ach. Wiston, Suffolk, Sept., 1887. — J. D. Gray. 

 A curious form. I have seen nothing quite like it before. It 

 comes in between frondosa and to?nentella. — J. G. Baker. 



R. decipieris, Dum. Nayland, Suffolk, Sept., 1888.— J. D. 

 Gray. Not decipiens as usually seen, which has short pedicels, 

 round fruit, and small, doubly serrated leaflets. 



Daucus gummifer, Lam. Torquay, S. Devon. — C. Waterfall. 

 Is Trinia vulgaris, a curious but not uncharacteristic mistake. — 

 A. Bennett. 



Galium verum, L., var. ochroleucum, Syme. Malvern Link, 

 Worcester, July 24th, 1888. — R. F. Towndrow. This seems 

 very nearly the same as the Deal plant described by Syme in 

 English Botany. I have seen the plant growing in its Deal 

 habitat and it looks remarkably distinct. — A. Bennett. 



