5 



G. sylvestre, Poll., var. nitidiilum, Thuill. Derbyshire. — A. E. 

 Lomax. Seems correct. — A. Bennett. 



Arctium nemorosu??i, Lej. Woods, Brock, Lanes., July, 1888. 

 — F. C. King. A. minus. — A. Bennett. 



Lobelia urens, L. Among the plants distributed by the Club 

 in 1886 — 87, I see by the Report of the Botanical Record Club 

 was Lobelia urens, localised as for Vice County I., West Cornwall. 

 I did not see, or hear of there being, such specimens sent out, 

 or I should have expressed a doubt of its occurrence there. — 

 Arthur Bennett. 



Pyrola secmida, L. Westmoreland. — C. Waterfall. A new 

 record. — A. Bennett. 



Statice Limonium, L., var. ? Seashore, Knot End, Lancashire, 

 Aug., 1883. — F. C. King. I do not see why this is not referable 

 to the type. It is not the var. pyramidalis of Syme's English 

 Botany. — A. Bennett. 



Symphytum tuberosum, L. Gloucester. — H. S. Thompson. A 

 new record, but for which vice-county, 34 or 33 } — A. Bennett. 



Myosotis Mittenii, Lond. Cat. Norfolk. Prof. Babington 

 assented to my so naming this three or four years ago, for the 

 Botanical Exchange Club. — E. F. Linton. 



Veronica spicata, L. St. Vincent's Rocks, Bristol, June, 1888. 

 — H. S. Thompson. Is F. hybrida, L. That is, it is not the 

 restricted spicata of the eastern counties, a much smaller plant, 

 and remaining so in my garden after four years' cultivation ; the 

 tallest specimen in the wet summer of 1888 was only eight inches 

 high, in that of 1887 only five inches. I have seen the Bristol 

 plant eighteen inches high and proportionately robust ; while 

 the Suffolk plant keeps to that peculiar habit of the heath land 

 plants "of seeking the ground" if such a term is allowable.— 

 A. Bennett. 



Euphrasia gracilis, Fr. Near Penzance, July, 1888. — H. S. 

 Thompson. Leaves are small, but I think correct. — A. Bennett. 



'.Polygonum convolvulus, L., var. pseudo-dumetorum, H. C. Wats. 

 —A. E. Lomax. This is not so characteristic of the likeness to 

 true dumetorum as Mr. H. C. Watson's specimens, which might 

 well be taken for the true plant, but Mr. Lomax's could hardly 

 be. — A. Bennett. 



