9 



R. ccesius, L., var. serpens, Godr. ? Beckdale, Helmsley, Yorks., 

 Aug., 1891. — A. B. Hall. I do not know var serpens {hispidus, 

 Bab.), and should have been content to put this under var. 

 umbrosus. — W. M. H. 



Rosa mollis, Sm., c. pseudo-ruhiginosa, Lej Hievaulx, Yorks. — 

 A. B. Hall. R. scahriuscula with globose fruit. — J. G. B. 



R. ruhiginosa, L., var. sylvicola, D. and E,. Smalesworth, Yorks. 

 A. B. Hall. Is R. SaUni var.— J. G. B. 



R. micrantha, Sm? Woods, Weston-super-Mare. — E. S. Gregory, 

 Is R. sepium, form. — J. G. B. 



R. micrnntha, Sm., var. Briggsii, Baker? Quarry, near Weston- 

 super-Mare. — E. S. Gregory. Probably R. sepium. — J. G, B. 



R. canina, L., b. surculosa. Woods, Bradley, Shirley, S. Derby. 

 — W. R. Linton. Not surculosa, but between sphmica and 

 dumalis. — J. G. B. 



R. spTiarica^ Gren. Eudyard, Staffs. — W. H. Painter. Yes. — 

 J. G. B. 



7^. frondosa. Woods, Thirsk, Yorks.- A B. Hall. Truly 

 frondosa as labelled. — J. G. B. 



R. dumetorum, Thuill. Biddulph, Staffs. — W. H. Painter, Is 

 R. frondosa. — J. G. B. 



R, andegavensis, Bast. Shirley, S. Derby. — W. R. Linton. 

 Yes.— J. G. B. 



R. andegavensis, Bast. Woods, Weston-super-Mare. — E. S. 

 Gregory. Yes- — J. G. B. 



R. collina, Jacq. Shirley, S. Derby. — W. R. Linton. Is var. 

 Koscinciana. — J. G. B. 



R. Koscinciana ? Epping Forest, Essex. — J. T. Powell. Is 

 R. stylosa. — J. G. B. 



R. Bakeri, Desegl. Boltby Moors, Thirsk, Yorks.— A. B. Hall. 

 Comes near Baheri but not quite matches it. — J. G. B. 



R. lihracteata, Bast. Boxted, Essex. — J. D. Gray. True bi- 

 bracteata. — J. G. B. 



R. bibracteata, Bast. Beckdale, Yorks. — A. B. Hall. Typical 

 arvensis. — J. G. B. 



Sedu?n rupestre, Huds. Rocky shore of lake, near Antrim, June, 

 1891. — R L. Praeger S. rupestre, Sm. = S. elegans, Lej. 

 Hudson's plant included this and S. Forsterianum, Sm. — A. B. 



Daucus gummifer. Lam. L'Ancresse, Guernsey, Aug., 1891. — 

 M. E. Dawber. The plant so called, but I do not think it is 

 what Lamarck intended. The only specimen I have seen which 



