5 



1892. — W. H. Painter. Yes, though with longer denser hairs 

 than usual on panicle rachis.— W. M. R. 



R. rusticanus, Merc. ? Cemetery Lane, Thirsk, Yorks., Sept., 

 1892. — A. B. Hall. I think this may go to R. elongatus, Merc, 

 as a var. under rusticanus. — W. M. E. 



R. sp. ? Borough Hill, Daventry, Northants., Aug., 1892. — 

 J. T. Powell. One of the thyrsoideus-V^ke forms, of which we 

 seem to have several in England. The true thyrsoideus, V/imm., 

 has much weaker panicle prickles, and a furrowed stem. — 

 W. M. E. 



R. macrophyllus, W. and N. Near Barracks, Warley, Essex, 

 Aug., 1892. — J. T. Powell. Yes, with exceptionally strong 

 panicle. — W. M. E. 



R. macrophyllus, W. and N. Middle Marwood, N. Devon, 

 July 29th, 1892. — W. H. Painter. Yes, a large flowered form 

 approaching var. Schlechtendalii, W. and N. And I should say 

 the same of a somewhat different plant sent by Mr. J. E. Griffith 

 from Penfeddcoed Ed., Bangor (Aug. 1892), and named by him 

 R. Bloxamii, Lees. — W. M. E. 



R. earpinifolius, W. and N. ? Quarry, Wass Bank, Ooxwold, 

 Yorks., Sept., 1892. — A. B. Hall. R. leucostachys, Schleich. — 

 W. M. E. 



R. macrophyllus J W. and N. ? Elazendale and Old Byland 

 Ghyll, Thirsk, Yorks., Sept., 1892.— A. B. Hall. Good R. 

 pallidus, W. and N. (non. Bab.) though with smaller petals than 

 usual.— W. M. E. 



R. longithyrsiger, Lees. Near Llanberis, July, 1892. — J. E. 

 Griffith. Yes.— W. M. E. 



R. rosaceus, W. and N., " Woodland form." Thickets, Jordans, 

 Bucks. —A. B. Hall. This is rosaceus var. infecundus, W. M. 

 Eogers. (v. J. of B., 1892, p. 338). I have seen Bucks, speci- 

 mens of it before, through Mr. Druce.. — W. M. E. 



R. S'ystrix, Weihe? Warley Common, Essex, Aug., 1892. — 

 J. T. Powell. Perhaps under Hystrix, but the material is in- 

 sufficient, and seems exceptionally weak.— W. M. E. 



i^. sp. High Beech, Essex, July, 1892.— J. T. Powell. I 



