11 



S. umlellatum, L. Llanberis, Sept., 1892. — E. W. Phillips. 

 Correctly named. — F. J. H. (1). 



H. sp. ? Llanberis, Sept., 1892.— E. W. Phillips. Unless 

 these are abnormally broad leaved forms of H. umhellatum, they 

 seem to be intermediate in characters between that species and 

 H. horeale. I have seen nothing quite like them before, and 

 as Mr. Phillips sends typical plants of both species from the 

 same locality, there is a strong suggestion of possible hybridity. — 

 P. J. H. (2 and 3). 



H. sp. ? Llanberis, Sept., 1892.— E. W. Phillips. H. triden- 

 tatum, Fr.— F. J. H. 



horeale, Fr. Llanberis, Sept., 1892.— E. W. Phillips. 

 Correctly named. — F. J. H. 



S. sp. ? Eiver bank, Eievaulx, Yorks., Sept., 1892.— A. B. 

 Hall. Is S. commutatum\ Beck, (horeale, Fr.). — F. J, H. 



^sp. Deepdale, Upper Wharfedale, Aug., 1892.— T. A. 

 Cotton. One specimen of these = H. anglicum, Fr., the other 

 two belong to E.. scoticum, F. J. Hanb., I believe, but should 

 like to have seen more and stronger specimens before making so 

 great an addition to the known range of this species. — F. J. H. 



H. sp. ? Cracow, Wharfedale, July, 1892.— T. A. Cotton. 

 H. vulgatum, Fr. — F. J. H. 



^. sp. ? Hetton, Skipton, July, 1892.— T. A. Cotton. B:. 

 vulgatum, var. sciapliilum. — F. J. H. 



S. sp. } Kettlewell, Wharfedale, Aug., 1892.— T. A. Cotton. 

 S. anglicum, Fr. — F. F. H. 



R. sp. ? Starbotton, Wharfedale, Aug., 1892.— T. A. Cotton. 

 Is H. vulgatum, Fr. — F. J. H. 



sp. ? Keld, Swaledale, Aug., 1892.— T. A. Cotton.— i7. 

 gothicum, Fr. — F. J. H. 



m sp. ? Gayle, Hawes, Aug., 1892.— T. A. Cotton. H. vul- 

 gatum, Fr. — F. J. H. 



Statice Limonium, L., a. genuina, Syme. Ashford, near Barn- 

 staple, N. Devon, July, 1892.— W. H. Painter. Yes.— A. B. 



S. Limonium, L., a. genuina, Syme. Fingringhoe, near Col- 

 chester, Essex, July, 1892.— A. B. Hall. Yes.— A. B. 



