3 



R. Flammula, L. v., i^seiido-reptans, Syme. St. Saviour's, 

 Guernsey, 2, vii, 1893. — Miss M. Dawber. Rather v. angus- 

 tifolius, Wallroth, Scliecl-Crit., p, 289. — A. B. 



E. Flammula, L., y. pseudo-rejytans, Sjme. York Towd, Surrey, 

 July, 1884, — E. Straker. May be, but such specimens are totally 

 insufficient to determine plants. — A. B. 



R. acris, L., v. vulgatus, Jord. Huddersfield, S. W. Yorks., 

 13, V, 1893. — T. W. Woodhead. Seems correct, but too young. 

 —A. B. 



Fumaria 'pallidiflora^ Jord., v. Boroei, Jord. Saintfield, Co. 

 Down, July, 1893, — C. H. Waddell. I should have named this 

 F. muralis, Sender. — A. B. 



F. pallidiflora, Jord., v. Borcei, Jord. Torquay, S, Devon, 

 June, 1888. — C. AYaterfall. S|)ecimen poor, looks like 2Mllidifiora 

 only.— W. R. L. 



F. confusa, Jord. Malvern, ^Yorc, June, 1886. — R. F. 

 Towndrow. Probably correct as to the piece, though the specimen 

 is a wretched one. — A. B. 



F. Vaillantiiy Lois. Cherry Hinton, Cambs,, Oct., 1893. — 

 A. H. Evans. Comm. H. P. Reader. I could have told this in 

 a minute if I had seen it fresh. I have gathered hundreds of 

 F. 'parviflora^ but none like this, I believe it to be correctly 

 referred to VaiUantii, but it is, perhaps, the v. gracilis, Knaf. — 

 A. B. 



Barharea intermedia, Bor. \Yitley, Surrey, 10, vi, 1893 — 

 A. H. W. Dodd. B. vulgaris^ R. Br., I consider. — A, B. 



B, intermedia, Bor. Thirsk, N. Yorks, May, 1893.— A. B. Hall. 



Too yonng, not intermedia. — E. F. Linton. It has not the habit 

 of vulgaris, though the pedicels are almost patent (whea young). 

 Certainly not intermedia, but I am not sure of the name it should 

 bear. — A. B. 



B? Saintfield, Co. Down, May, 1893.— C. H. Waddell, 



Is J5. intermedia, Bor. — A.B. 



Cardamine p)^'Oitensis L., b. dentata. Hayne and \Yelw. Ivy 

 Castle, Guernsey, 9, v, 1893. — M. Dawber. Probably correct, 

 but material insufficient. — A. B. From specimen received, I am 



