5 



R, villicaulis, Koehlj v. Selmeri, Lindeb. SaintHeld, Co. 

 Down, 2, ix., 1893.-0. H. Waddell. Yes.— W. M. K 



R. anglosaxonicus, Gelerfc. Matlock Bath, Derbyshire, 24, vii, 

 1893. — W". H. Painter. The panicle is R. Lindleianus, Lees, 

 and presumably the leaves are the same, if shadegrown. The 

 leaves are much more glabrous than usual. — E. F. Linton. R. 

 Lindleianus, Lees, — W, M. K. 



R. mercicuSf Bagnall. Near Bethel, Anglesey, Aug., 1893.— 

 J. E. Griiiith. In the sheet sent to me the two panicles are 

 probably R. mercicus, while the two stem pieces are, I believe, 

 certainly R. pulcherrimus, Neum W. M. R. 



R, conspicuus, P. J. Muell. High Tor, Matlock Bath, 

 Derbyshire, 24, vii, 1893.— W. H. Painter, Ordinary R 

 leuGOStachys, Schleich. — W. M. K. 



R. micans, Gren. and Godr. Near Llanberis, Canarvonshire, 

 Aug., 1893. — J. E. Griffith. Clearly not R. micans, but I cannot 

 name it without seeing better specimens, — Yf. M. R. Not 

 micans. — E. F. Linton. 



R, Drejeri, G. Jensen. Partly in shade, Saintfield, Co. Down, 

 Aug,, 1893.— 0. H. Waddell. Yes.— W. M. K 



R. Boul, Near Bodorgan Station, Anglesey, 



August, 1893. — J. E. Griffith. I suggested the name R. 

 prcBruptorum, Boul. for this plant, though I suppose the felted 

 leaves to be untypical— W. M. B. 



R, Koehleri, Weihe, v. pallidus, Bab. Near Olton, Warwick, 

 18 J viii, 1893. — H. S. Thomson. Does not this belong to the 

 form of R, rosaceus, W, and N., for which I have suggested the 

 varietal name infecundus ? I cannot say ceitainly without seeing 

 better material.— W. M. B. I considered infecundus without 

 doubt.— W. R, L. 



R. Koehleri, Weihe, v. pallidus, Bab. Near Garth Ferry, 

 Anglesey, Aug., 1893.— J. E. Griffith, Saintfield, Co. Down, 

 Sept., 1893.— C, H. Waddell. Yes.— W. M. R. 



R. dumetorum, W. and N., v. ferox, Weihe. Repton, Derby- 

 shire, Aug., 3, 1893.^ — W, H. Painter. R, dicmelorurn, W. and 

 N., I suppose, but hardly ferox. — W. M. R. 



