Koeleria oris fata, var. Luton, Beds., 6th Sept., 1894. — D. M. 

 Higgins. Miss Higgins' specimens seem to be the var. gracilis, 

 Boreau, — A. B. 



Poa polynoda, VdiXn} Wall at Eltham, W. Kent, 15th July, 

 J 894. Prof. Hackel wrote P. compretsa on the label. I don't 

 know whether he meant to exclude P. polynoda^ with the 

 description of which this appears to agree. — A. H. W. Dod. — 

 P. compressa, L. — E. Hackel. 



Festuca elatior, L. var. loliacea, — Huds. Knock Ross, Co. 

 Westmeath, i8th July> 1894.— I am doubtful if some of this 

 may not be the var. pseudo-loliacea ; 1 find the two forms on the 

 same plant ! — H. C. Levinge. Both are merely states of F. 

 elatior^ and therefore by no means impossible on the same 

 plant.— W. R. L. 



Lolium . Hinckley, Leicester, July, 1894. — H. P. Reader. 



L. iialioumy A. Bv. var. muticum, D. C. — E. Hackel. 



Lastroea Filix mas, Prest. v. Borreri, Newm., Bilberry, near 

 Holmfirth, S. W. Yorks., 9th Aug., 1894.— T. W. Woodhead. 

 Not V. Borreri which has yellow fronds with sharply truncate 

 pinnules. — W. R. L. 



Asplenium lanceolatum, Huds. fmicrodon ? J — Old wall, among 

 the masonry, Newlyn, Penzance, Cornwall, 16th Aug., 1894. — 

 E. S. Gregory. I should say not the variety. — W. R. L. 



Correction of Report for 1894. 



I should like to remark, with reference to last year's report, 

 that the plant I sent as Barharea intermedia, Bor., from Witley, 

 was gathered in company with the Rev. E. S, Marshall, whose 

 specimens were confirmed by Svante Murbeck. It is just 

 possible, but not I think the case, that I mixed a specimen or 

 two of B. vulgaris with the others. 



My Glyceria decclinata, Brit., was also gathered with Mr. Marshall, 

 at Pease Marsh. Prof. Hackel confirmed the naming of speci- 

 mens sent to Botanical Exchange Elub. — A. H. Wolley Dod. 



