12 



M. . Damp spot at roadside, Loughadian, P. of Adha- 



derg, Co. Down, Aug. 24th, 1895. — H. W. Lett. M. arvensis, L, 

 var. Nammularia, apparently, but too immature to be sure. — A.B. 



Ballota nigra, var. ruder alis, Koch 7 Roadside, near seacoast, 

 Cloughey Bay, Co Down, 1894. — C. H. Waddell. Not ruderalts 

 true, but evidently a form connecting the two varieties, but 

 under foetida ; in ruderalis the calyx teeth are gradually acumin- 

 ated into long spinous teeth ; in Mr. Waddell's plant the teeth 

 are more of a mucro, although they are longer than usual, and I 

 believe it to be the S. urticifolla, Maly. En. PI. Aust. 18 f, i8a8 

 = B. urticifolia, Ortmann, Fl. Carlsb. — A. B. 



Ajuga pyramidalis, L. Ballvryan, Co. Clare, May 15th, 1895; 

 leg. P. B. O'Kelly.— H. C. Levmge. 



CJmiopodium opuUfolium, Schrad. By canal, Willesden, Mid- 

 dlesex, Aug., 1895. — P. Reader. 



C. hybridum, L. Beckford, Gloucestershire, August, 1895. — 

 H. P. Reader. 



Salix fragilisy L., var. decipiens, Hoffm. ? Banks of Codbeck, 

 N. of Thirsk, Yorks., April and August, 1894.— A. B. Hall. 1 

 quite think this is S frag His X triandra, i.e. S. decipiens, Hoffm. 

 — W. R. L. S. decipiens, Hoffm. — E. F. Linton. 



S. triandra viminalis {8. hippophaefolia, Thuill.) R, Wye, 

 near Ross, Herefordshire, 28th April 1892. Legit A. Ley. I 

 have not been able to get foliage to go with these specimens ; 

 but they are the right plant, viz. : S. hippophaefolia, Thuill , 

 which is undoubtedly S. triandra X viminalis. This hybrid (or 

 form of the hybrid) seems to keep quite distinct from any form 

 I have seen of >S'. undulata, Ebrh. I have come across no con- 

 necting links such as should occur, if S. undulata were also a 

 form of the same hybrid ; which I am convinced that it is not. 

 — E. F. Linton. 



S. . Burbage Wood, Leicestershire, May and August, 



1895. — H. P. Reader. A form of S. aurita x cinerea (S. lutes- 

 cens, Kern.y — W. R. L. 



