9 



R. . Margery Wood, near Reigate, Surrey 



(Eef. No. 1), Aug., 1897.— E. S. Salmon. " i?. rudis, W. 

 and N."— W. M. R. 



R.folwsus. W. and N. Near "Robin Hood," Ej)ping 

 Forest, S. Essex, Aug. 14tli, 1897.— J. T. Powell. " Yes." 

 — W. M. R. 



R. Fowellii, Rogers. Near Higli Beacli, Epping 

 Forest, Essex, July, 1893.— J. T. Powell. " Yes."— 

 W. M. R. 



R. corylifoliiLS^ Sm. var. cyclopltyUas^ Lindeb. By 

 Loch Killisport, near Aclialioisli, Cantire (Rei. No. 15). 

 Aug. 31st, 1897. — C. E. Salmon. ''I think rightly named 

 and new for Cantire." — W. M. R. 



R. cojyiifolius, Sm. x ?'usficanus,^Levc. Near Reigate, 

 Surrey (Ref. No. 4), July, 1897. Plant almost barren. — 

 E. S. Salmon. " Has every appearance of being rightly 

 named, though some of the stem pieces, if taken singly, 

 would fairly represent a form of R. cor i/Iif alius, without 

 obvious intermixture of R. rusticanus. — W. M. R. 



So many of the Rev. H. \Y. Lett's brambles are still 

 so difficult to determine that it seems best for me to report 

 on the whole of them, apart from the specimens contributed 

 by other members ; at the same time revising, so far as 

 seems necessary, my suggestions on his plants in the last 

 two reports. — W. M. R. 



R. erythriims, Genev., Whinny Hill, Aghaderg Glebe, 

 Co. Down (Ref. No. 14), 1897, July 20. "Not eri/fhn'niis, 

 but a remarkable form of R. Lindleianiis, with terminal 

 leaflet subrotund — acummate — cordate. Is not No. 32 a 

 small state of the same ?" — W. M. R. 



R. rhamnifolius, W. & N., Mill Hill Lane, Ballin- 

 taggart, P. of A.ghaderg, Co. Down (Ref. No. 23), July 

 22, 1897. " Yes, I think R. rhamnifoUiis^ W. clc N. sp. coll., 

 but not quite the common British form of it i^R. cardiu- 

 phyllus, Lefv. & Muell)."— W. M. R. 



R. . Shankill, P. of Aghaderg, Co. Down 



(Ref. No. 48), Aug. 7, 1897. "I suppose a form of 

 R. rhamnifoUus, sp. coll., but I remember nothing quite like 

 it."— W. M. R. 



