8 



R. . Hedgebank, Saintfield, co. Down, Sept. 



1898, No. 65.— C. H. Waddell. "Apparently not quite 

 R. incurvatiLs. I should like to see a better series." — 

 W. M. K. 



R. LindleiaiuLs^ Lees. Woolpit Warren, W. Suffolk, 

 July 30, 1898, No. 4.— J. T. Powell. "Undoubtedly 

 R. Lindleianus, Lees, a broad-leaved form that I know 

 well."— W. M. E. 



R. nemoralis^ P. J. Muell, var. glahratus. Bab. 

 Woolpit Warren, W. Suffolk, August 5, 1898, No. 7.— 

 J. T. Pow^ell. " I think perhaps a form of R. nemoralis 

 i\ glahratus as Mr. Powell supposed, but the stem pieces 

 are peculiar."— W. M. R. 



R. jpulcherrimus^ Neum. Woolpit Warren, W. Suf- 

 folk, August 5, 1898, No. 6.— J. T. Powell. "With 

 Mr. Powell I cannot separate this from R. 'pulcherrimus^ 

 Neum., but it is an extraordinarily glandular form of 

 it."— W. M. R. 



R. . Reigate Heath, Surrey, July 10, 1898, 



No. 2. — ^C. E. Salmon. " Probably R. dumnoniensis^ 

 Bab., but unfortunately the specimens are too immature 

 for certain determination, especially the stem pieces. In 

 normal well developed plants of that species the prickles 

 are longer, the leaflets broader, and the sepals refiexed. 

 I have no other Surrey record for it." — W. M. R. 



R, rusticanus^ Merc. Willerby Lane, nr. Cottingham, 

 E. Yorks, v.c. 61, Sept., 1898. — C. Waterfall "Yes." 

 — W. M. R. 



R. . Lisnagade, co. Down, No. 3, 30/7/98.— 



H. W. Lett. " R, Schlechtendaln, Weihe (typical)."— 

 W. M. R. 



R. macrophyllus^ var. Schlechtendalii^ Weihe. Saint- 

 field, CO. Down, August, 1898.— C. H. Waddell. "Yes." 

 — W. M. R. 



R. chlorothyrsos^ Focke ? Trailing over bushes in 

 shrubbery. Magheralin, co. Down, July 20, 1896. — C. H. 

 Waddell. " I am still unable to name this. Though in 



